About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Uttlesford review

CSP: Uttlesford Published: August 2023 Year of death: 2020 Extracted: 12 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review highlights significant failures in the timely assessment and management of the perpetrator's mental health, a lack of understanding and assessment of the complex caring relationship with the victim, including carer stress and potential coercive control, and poor multi-agency coordination and communication.

Home Office classifications

43 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - was a carer
  • Victim - carer for perpetrator
  • Victim - carer assessed
  • Victim - physical disability
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - serious or life limiting illness
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - was a carer
  • Perpetrator - carer for victim
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Perpetrator - self harm
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - suicide attempts
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • Perpetrator - died by suicide
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

12 recommendations pulled from the report · 5 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Essex Safeguarding Adults Board

The Essex Safeguarding Adults Board (ESAB) should seek assurance from all partners that there is an understanding of the requirement of carer assessments under the Care Act and from Adult Social Care, and that these are effectively undertaken.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to EPUT | Essex Adult Social Care

EPUT and Essex Adult Social Care to: -
(a) Develop closer working relationships, in particular undertaking coordinated assessments working towards joint care planning and provide a progress update to ESAB.
(b) EPUT and Adult Social Care should provide evidence that activity is coordinated withing the terms of the Section 75 agreement (NHS 2006)

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to EPUT

EPUT should provide evidence and demonstrate to ESAB that: -
(a)The recommendations within their internal investigation report are being implemented and the progress of that implementation.
(b)That the transformation of the assessment service and delivery pathways have delivered the anticipated service improvement.
(c)That where referrals are made from the community that the response is timely and feedback on the course of action is offered
(d) That where there is evidence of medication misuse by a client a timely medication review is undertaken.
(e) That EPUT reviews their Access Policy to take into account the fact that persons not attending appointments are vulnerable due to mental health issues and may require additional support.
(f) That all of the above are managed in order to ensure learning is embedded within practice.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Essex Safeguarding Board

The Essex Safeguarding Board should highlight to partner agencies the importance of making appropriate safeguarding referrals with reference to the LGA/ADASS guidance `Understanding what constitutes a safeguarding concern and how to support effective outcomes and the ‘Safeguarding Concerns Framework’.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Essex Safeguarding Board

The Essex Safeguarding Board should use this review to build on the Making Safeguarding Personal Project to include seeking innovative means of facilitating the ability of adult’s voices to be effectively heard.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to All agencies involved in this review

All agencies involved in this review should consider how it can continue to promote a positive culture of professional curiosity which supports effective multi-agency working and how this can be assured and monitored through reflective supervision and performance management

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to All agencies in this review

All agencies in this review should ensure that professionals who are responsible for services are aware that coercion and controlling behaviours can form part of complex relationships and of the ways that this may manifest.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to EPUT | EPUT's commissioners

EPUT and their commissioners should review their current policies and procedures in relation to Domestic Abuse and coercive control and provide evidence that this is embedded in their training and practice.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Essex Safeguarding Adults Board

The Essex Safeguarding Adults Board continues to promote the Hoarding Guidance and be assured it is understood and that agencies consider and use the available tools to assess and seek support for hoarding behaviour.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 10

Addressed to Contributing agencies to this review

Contributing agencies to this review should provide the SETDAB and ESAB with assurance that the single agency actions identified in the Individual Management Reports are completed and reported on.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 11

Addressed to Essex Adult Social Care

Essex Adult Social Care should provide assurance to Essex Safeguarding Adults Board that where a care and support package is required immediately but there are moving and handling concerns and a specialist assessment is indicated, consideration is given as to how to provide support in the meantime rather than waiting for the outcome of that additional assessment.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 12

Addressed to Uttlesford Community Safety Partnership

Uttlesford Community Safety Partnership to ensure that local domestic abuse services and SET DAB resources are promoted to local agencies and communities.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗