About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Stoke-on-Trent review

CSP: Stoke-on-Trent Published: August 2023 Year of death: 2018 Extracted: 4 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The report identifies concerns regarding the timeliness and quality of pre-sentence reports, particularly the availability of police call-out information, which may impact risk assessment and safe sentencing in domestic abuse cases. It also highlights issues with the speed of multi-agency risk assessment processes and the need for courts to receive updated information for adjourned cases.

Home Office classifications

22 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - housing issues
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to probation services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - died by suicide
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - probation services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

4 recommendations pulled from the report · 1 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Stoke-on-Trent Community Safety Partnership

The Stoke-on-Trent Community Safety Partnership should request further information from the National Probation Service (NPS) on the number and percentage of domestic abuse cases in its area where information requested about previous police “call outs” has been received in time to be included in pre sentence reports;

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1

Addressed to National Probation Service

Report authors must ensure Pre-Sentence Reports must always state explicitly whether information included has been verified.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Stoke-on-Trent Community Safety Partnership

The Stoke-on-Trent Community Safety Partnership should explore with the National Probation Service (NPS) the feasibility of gathering information, when Covid-19 restrictions allow, on the number and percentage of domestic abuse cases in its area where: (i) probation officers have concluded that that they cannot complete sufficient risk assessment to submit a safe sentence recommendation due to the unavailability of information; (ii) adjournments are requested by NPS, whether these were granted, and if so, the length of the adjournment; (iii) how the figures in relation to Stoke-on-Trent cases compare to other parts of the West Midlands;

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Stoke-on-Trent Community Safety Partnership

The Stoke-on-Trent Community Safety Partnership should bring to the attention of the HM Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) at a national level, the issue identified through this DHR, as to how courts can check whether there is new information which should be taken into account to inform sentencing in cases concerning offences related to domestic abuse that have been adjourned, and / or committed to Crown Courts.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗