About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Manchester review

CSP: Manchester Published: July 2023 Year of death: 2011 Extracted: 14 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The report identifies missed opportunities by agencies to assess and respond to domestic abuse disclosures, particularly regarding risk at separation and the significance of specific injuries. It highlights gaps in inter-agency information sharing, risk assessment tools, and staff training for both victims and perpetrators.

Home Office classifications

27 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to housing services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - immigration involvement
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - stalking
  • Aggravating factors - digital stalking
  • Aggravating factors - sexual abuse
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

14 recommendations pulled from the report · 2 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to GP Practice | NHS Manchester

GP practice, with the support of NHS Manchester, to identify a Safeguarding Lead and for the Lead to complete duties according to the Safeguarding Children Toolkit.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Manchester Safeguarding Children Board (MSCB) | Manchester Safeguarding Adults Board (MSAB)

That MSCB and MSAB develop a Domestic Abuse Protocol to promote the referral pathway for victims of domestic abuse, including sexual violence and recommendations on best practice for those who work with perpetrators of domestic abuse including sexual violence. All agencies likely to identify victims and perpetrators of domestic violence, including GP practices and housing associations, should be included.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to GP Practice

Ensure all staff are aware who the Safeguarding Lead is and of their own role in respect to Safeguarding Children, Adults including Domestic Violence.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to GP Practices | Housing Providers | Police Forces | NHS Trusts | Domestic Abuse Support Services

That all agencies should promote the take up of domestic abuse training for their front line staff to ensure that they recognise risk, [including the significance of bite marks as a possible indicator of sexual abuse] assess risk and respond appropriately to disclosures of domestic abuse. Training should also be offered in how best to work with perpetrators of domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to GP Practice

Improve record keeping in the practice. Guidelines to be produced to include when to record and when more detail is essential.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Manchester Domestic Abuse Forum

That the Manchester Domestic Abuse Forum should consider a publicity campaign to target family and friends of victims of domestic abuse to direct them to support services and enable them to know how to support those who confide in them.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Manchester Safeguarding Adults Board (MSAB) | Manchester Safeguarding Children Board (MSCB)

That MSAB and MSCB consider whether all employers should have domestic abuse policies.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to GP Practice

Safeguarding Lead to ensure the practice is fully compliant with children and adult including domestic violence safeguarding training.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to GP Practice

Share findings of the Serious Case Review report with: NHS Manchester/ Clinical Commissioning Group (CCGs), Mental Health commissioning colleagues Child and Adult Safeguarding colleagues

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to GP Practice

Generic competencies in GP Training that relate to risk assessment and management are applied in safeguarding situations and demonstrated to their supervisors

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗