About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review
Epping Forest review
CSP: Epping ForestPublished: July 2023Year of death: 2017Extracted: 7 recs
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
The review identified concerns regarding staff confidence and consent in information sharing, particularly across local authority boundaries. It also highlighted the need for improved support and recognition for carers and families of vulnerable adults and individuals with mental health needs, alongside better multi-agency engagement.
Home Office classifications
14 tags
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
Victim - mental ill health
Victim - cognitive disorder (dementia or alzheimer's disease)
Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
Perpetrator - case heard in court
Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
Perpetrator - substance misuse
Perpetrator - mental ill health
DHR process - health services recommendations
DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
DHR process - training recommendation themes
DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
DHR process - other recommendation themes
Extracted recommendations
7 recommendations pulled from the report · 4 matched to organisations in the index
Psychiatric Liaison Service and Access and Assessment Brief Intervention Team must be made aware that service users are taken on by Early Intervention in Psychosis Team for up to three years and can be referred back at any point during that time.
All Mental Health Service staff to continue to make attempts to obtain collaborative information and to indicate in progress notes the reason for not obtaining collaborative information from families and carers.
The findings of this investigation should be shared with the victim’s next of kin and the service user. A meeting should be offered and facilitated by the Integrated Care Director if required, in order to discuss the findings. The investigation panel was unable to contact the service user due to the Criminal Justice process. Should the service user request a copy of the findings of the report at a later date; the Integrated Care Director should arrange to share the findings of the report.
Addressed to
Southend Essex and Thurrock Domestic Abuse Strategic Board
The Southend Essex and Thurrock Domestic Abuse Strategic Board to continue to share learning from DHRs; in relation to this case to share the information sharing related learning from this case to all agencies, using existing networks, communication channels and events (e.g. flag through the Essex DHR Thematic Review highlight in training and cascade to other agencies). Specifically emphasising the need for agencies to ensure that staff to gain consent for information sharing (with other agencies and families) in their initial assessments with clients; and for agencies to ensure staff understand and feel confident about information sharing, in particular contacting other boroughs and areas.
Essex Safeguarding Adults Board to: seek assurance from its partners that support is available to carers; and ensure that support for carers is integrated into its training, awareness raising and communications relating to safeguarding adults.