About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Liverpool review

CSP: Liverpool Published: July 2023 Year of death: 2014 Extracted: 14 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
Agency risk assessments were seriously flawed, consistently underestimating the risk of domestic violence despite escalating incidents, coercion, and threats. There were missed opportunities for multi-agency intervention, appropriate referrals, and proactive inquiries into the impact of substance misuse and mental health on relationships.

Home Office classifications

35 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - housing issues
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Perpetrator - was a carer
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - suicide attempts
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - died by suicide
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

14 recommendations pulled from the report · 9 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Merseyside Police

When a perpetrator of ‘domestic violence’ has been arrested and bail is a consideration, either following or prior to any charge, then the application of conditions to keep the subject away from the victim and ensure their safety, must be applied.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1

Addressed to South Liverpool Homes

During the initial investigation of anti-social behaviour complaints, SLH will confirm the identity of any person present at the property at that time.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1

Addressed to GP Practice

GPs should make routine enquiries about domestic circumstances when conducting any assessment regarding mental health, drug or alcohol misuse. There are templates designed for use when patients present with mental health problems. Psychosocial, family and environmental aspects are included. The presence of abusive relationships is not specifically questioned.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Merseyside Police

When dealing with repeated low key ‘domestic incidents’ that involve alcohol abuse as a continued factor, then interventions and referrals to other agencies must be considered.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to South Liverpool Homes

Consideration should be given to conducting a home visit where there is a request for support and historical records indicate a potential issue at the property.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Merseyside Police

When there is information available indicating that an individual is abusing the benefit system, then details of that abuse must be shared with the Department of Works and Pensions.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to South Liverpool Homes

Refresher training to be given to all staff who record details of initial referrals relating to anti-social behaviour, to re-iterate the importance of capturing times of incidents.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Merseyside Police

When a person has been remanded to the custody of the courts and there is information available indicating that the person may be a suicide risk, then that information should be fully documented under the risk section of the Person Escort Record (PER) form that accompanies them to court and / or prison. It should also be highlighted personally to those other custodians.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Merseyside Police

When arrests and subsequent charges are made in relation to ‘domestic incidents’ and alcohol abuse is a contributing and continued factor, then officers dealing must ensure that the court is informed of this and consideration be given to applying for the necessary Alcohol Treatment Referral Order (ATRO) as part of a community service order.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Merseyside Police

The current Force ‘Domestic Abuse’ Policy and Procedure should be amended at paragraph 10.2 to reflect that the subsequent interventions will be considered when a victim withdraws their allegation even before a suspect has been arrested. At present it is ambiguous and appears to indicate that such interventions can only be considered after charge.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Overview recommendat

Addressed to Merseyside Police | MARAC

There should be review of current guidance in relation to repeat domestic incidents. The review should consider the following areas: Does current policy and procedure ensure appropriate escalation, when the police are called repeatedly to ‘low level’ incidents, when risk may be assessed as bronze? Should there be a secondary trigger point resulting in automatic escalation (e.g. referral into MARAC, Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) or referral for IDVA services) if there a certain number of incidents, within a specified period? If so, what is the appropriate trigger point? (e.g. 3 incidents within 6 months). Where there is evidence of mutual violence, should all incidents involving the same couple (regardless of recorded ‘victim / perpetrator roles) be counted in relation to the above bullet point?

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Overview recommendat

Addressed to Merseyside Police

There should be a review of policy, guidance and training needs in relation to: Domestic violence risk assessments, with a focus on circumstances where there is evidence that a victim has withdrawn a statement under direct threat and coercion by the perpetrator. Ensuring that alleged victims are not interviewed in the presence of alleged perpetrators.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Overview recommendat

Addressed to Merseyside Police | Liverpool City Council

There should be a review of referral systems and communications between Merseyside Police and Liverpool ASC, to establish why the police referral for mental health services was not received, or (if received) was not recorded by ASC and acted on.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Overview recommendat

Addressed to Liverpool CCG

Liverpool CCG should ask to the GP practice to review and report back on local domestic violence guidance and practice, in the light of learning from this case. The review should consider: How primary care records may be flagged, to ensure that GPs are aware of evidence that a patient may be a perpetrator or victim of domestic violence. Pro-active enquiry into potential relationship problems and domestic abuse risks with patients who have mental health problems, alcohol dependencies, chaotic lifestyles, or other known risk factors. Any training needs relating to the above two points.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗