About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Lincoln review

CSP: Lincoln Published: July 2023 Year of death: 2019 Extracted: 5 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identifies concerns regarding the depth of professional curiosity in exploring family dynamics and negative comments from individuals with mental health issues. It highlights the need for practitioners to assess risks of violence to others from those with suicidal ideation, and to be aware of academic pressure and violent media consumption as potential risk factors.

Home Office classifications

21 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - immigration involvement
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Child - immigration involvement
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - suicide attempts
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • Perpetrator - immigration involvement
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - other educational institution recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

5 recommendations pulled from the report · 4 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Safer Lincolnshire Partnership

The Safer Lincolnshire Partnership should actively encourage professionals that work within the emotional and mental health arena, in the Lincolnshire area, to make use of professional curiosity. They should also provide a briefing in relation to the vulnerabilities of ACEs and risk of matricide.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Safer Lincolnshire Partnership

The Safer Lincolnshire Partnership should ask the Lincolnshire Suicide Prevention Partnership to promote messages in relation to risks to others in particular family members from those individuals who are expressing self-harm and suicide ideation.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3a

Addressed to Safer Lincolnshire Partnership

The Safer Lincolnshire Partnership should ensure that those working with students are fully aware of the risks that academic pressure brings in relation to research highlighting this as one of the key risk factors in suicide and homicide.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3b

Addressed to Safer Lincolnshire Partnership

The Safer Lincolnshire Partnership should ensure that the University encourages all students to ‘opt in’ and when sharing information do share with the ‘nominated person’ the risk of harm to themselves and others.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Safer Lincolnshire Partnership

The Safer Lincolnshire Partnership should ensure that the risks of increased aggression involved with watching violent films is communicated in learning bulletins. (Although fully acknowledged that the perpetrator watching violent films wasn’t known by professionals until the criminal trial, it is good learning from practitioners to be aware of this risk and vulnerability.)

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗