About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Plymouth review

CSP: Plymouth Published: July 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 5 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The report highlights the unrecognised danger of coercive and controlling behaviours, particularly in elderly relationships, and the lack of professional and public awareness regarding escalating risk factors like deteriorating mental health and threats of separation.

Home Office classifications

23 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - serious or life limiting illness
  • Victim - immigration involvement
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - suicide attempts
  • Perpetrator - serious or life limiting illness
  • Perpetrator - died by suicide
  • Perpetrator - immigration involvement
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

5 recommendations pulled from the report · 1 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Age UK | PDAS | local safeguarding boards

The panel recommends that awareness of coercive and controlling behaviours should form part of all campaigns which target both the public and professionals.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to GP surgeries | CCG

To recommend that all GP surgeries have ‘stand-alone’ policies for domestic abuse and coercive control. This action will be included in the Community Safety Partnership Action Plan, and GP surgeries or the CCG will be provided with a basic template for a good domestic abuse policy by PDAS. This policy should include guidance on procedure to follow where coercion and control are identified. All GP Surgeries have been provided with a template policy.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to GPs | CCG

the panel recommend that GPs consider adding general questions about domestic abuse and coercive control, what is known as Routine Enquiry (RE), with all their elderly patients. This may be especially important where depression or anxiety are identified. This RE could also be part of an annual review for people over the age of 75. This recommendation will be taken forward by the CCG.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to CCG

that the CCG investigate either the use of a tool like IRIS which is specifically designed to help GPs with such issues, or to make sure that at least one person at the surgery is trained in how to respond to disclosures of domestic abuse. Domestic Abuse and Coercive Control are significant issues affecting a significant proportion of the patients in any surgery. There are models for domestic abuse champions to be identified in any organisation. It would be this champion who may take referrals, or could advise the GP or other person who takes a disclosure.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Safer Plymouth

The panel considered that this case be written as an anonymised case study to help professionals understand the often hidden nature of control, and its danger when challenged. This case would also highlight some of the specific problems facing elderly people in our communities. The Independent Chair will write a summary and anonymous version of this case to share with local agencies for use in their training.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗