About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Northampton review

CSP: Northampton Published: June 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 12 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review concluded that the victim's death was not predictable or preventable, but identified learning points. These include the need for improved inter-agency information sharing, enhanced safeguarding training for GPs on mental health and domestic abuse, and increased workplace awareness and reporting mechanisms for domestic abuse within the police force.

Home Office classifications

23 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - depression
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd)
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - employer recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

12 recommendations pulled from the report · 5 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 4.2.2.1

Addressed to NHS England Central Midlands (GP)

Reminder to GPs regarding parental mental health issues and how an adult’s mental wellbeing will affect family life.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.2.2

Addressed to NHS England Central Midlands (GP)

Review of safeguarding training to draw in learning from this case regarding Mental Health concerns and how that may influence domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.2.3

Addressed to NHS England Central Midlands (GP)

The GP leads for safeguarding will receive specific domestic abuse training as part of their annual safeguarding training update commissioned by the CCG/NHS England.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.3.1

Addressed to Northamptonshire Police

To develop an educational publicity campaign within the workplace defining domestic abuse, its known frequency and the statistics that show that it will be affecting the lives of their work colleagues.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.3.2

Addressed to Northamptonshire Police

To consider the development of a formal and confidential / anonymous reporting process allowing employees to submit concerns they may have about domestic abuse happening to a colleague.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.3.3

Addressed to Northamptonshire Police

These recommendations should be considered to bring the ‘hidden crime’ of domestic abuse out into the domain of the workplace to promote confidence in reporting and that the organisation will act positively to the reports.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.3.4

Addressed to Northamptonshire Police

Greater consideration should be given to the placement of officers/staff on restricted or ‘light duties’ taking account of their circumstances, the number allocated to a department and the additional stresses that can be caused to line managers.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.3.5

Addressed to Northamptonshire Police

This recommendation is suggested in order to reduce the impact on those that have to manage the individuals and to prevent or reduce the automatic placement of personnel into departments that can take place without knowledge of wider implications.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.4.1

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

More direct sharing of plans and information for individuals between occupational health services, GPs and mental health should be promoted – immediately.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.4.2

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

Community Safety Partnership to consider providing advice to local employers about the possible consequences of stress at work for family relationships including the possibility of domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.4.2

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

Community Safety Partnership to link in with Countywide Strategic IPV Board in order to develop approaches in raising awareness and educating communities on controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship which causes someone to fear that violence will be used against them.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.4.3

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

DHR Overview Report to be shared with other relevant local partnerships – Adult Safeguarding Board and the Health and Well-Being Board. Dates of meetings to be confirmed – within 3 months.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗