About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Kent review

CSP: Kent Published: June 2023 Year of death: 2011 Extracted: 8 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The report highlights systemic failures in information sharing and multi-agency risk assessment, particularly concerning domestic abuse, mental health, and substance misuse. Agencies often lacked a full family picture, leading to missed opportunities for intervention and questionable child protection decisions.

Home Office classifications

48 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - substance misuse
  • Victim - housing issues
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - adjustment disorder
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - psychosis
  • Victim - self harm
  • Victim - suicidal thoughts
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Victim - referred to marac at any time
  • Victim - case heard at marac before homicide
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
  • Children - removed into care
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - attended drug and alcohol services
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

8 recommendations pulled from the report · 6 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to KCA | Greenwich Housing Service

KCA and Greenwich Housing Service to review their policy/method of retention of records to ensure they are able to fully participate in future DHRs and other reviews.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Kent and Medway Community Safety Partnerships

To review the process for obtaining IMRs and information from agencies and develop an escalation process when an agency from outside Kent and Medway fails to participate in a DHR.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Ministry of Justice

The Ministry of Justice to consider the creation of a good practice guide, including a check list for Probation Trusts for all HDC Assessments to include domestic abuse and child protection.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Home Office

The Home Office to consider issuing guidance to police forces regarding transfer of information between police forces when victims and offenders involved in domestic abuse move.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Home Office | NHS National Commissioning Board | Clinical Commissioning Groups

The Home Office to work with the NHS National Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups regarding publication of guidance for the commissioning and writing of IMRs from health providers, in particular developing a protocol for obtaining information from other areas.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Home Office | NHS National Commissioning Board | Clinical Commissioning Groups

The Home Office, the NHS National Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups to develop a training programme for IMR authors from the health economy.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Home Office

Home Office to issue guidance to Independent Chairs and Authors regarding involvement in a DHR of persons convicted of domestic homicide who have been victims of domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Home Office

The Home Office consider developing guidance regarding the identification of a lead professional in cases of domestic abuse where there are other significant issues such as mental ill-health, alcohol or drug misuse especially when one or more of those issues affects both victim and offender. The process could be similar to the one that already exists in the Care Programme Approach for the mentally ill or in the Child Assessment Framework.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗