About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Chorley and South Ribble review

CSP: Chorley and South Ribble Published: June 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 6 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review highlights the under-recognition of male victims of domestic abuse by professionals and the public, alongside inconsistent multi-agency information sharing and risk assessment. It also notes challenges in perpetrator engagement and a lack of concerted professional inquiry regarding escalating incidents.

Home Office classifications

42 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - panic attacks
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - suicide attempts
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to school as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to workplace (employer) as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

6 recommendations pulled from the report · 1 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

The Chair of the Community Safety Partnership should take local action to strengthen awareness raising opportunities for the safe disclosure, assessment and necessary interventions to protect and safeguard male victims of domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

The CSP should be assured that professionals across the local agencies have access to training specifically in relation to male victims of domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

The Community Safety Partnership should be assured that local policy and practice in relation to safeguarding children also includes the impact of hidden and overt domestic abuse

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership | Clinical Commissioning Group

The Community Safety Partnership should be assured that the CCG have considered the validity of screening for and recording disclosures of domestic abuse and recording these incidents by the application of an ‘Aggressive Behaviour READ Code’ and a summary on the patients record. This may be achieved via the General Medical Services (GMS) Contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF)
Additionally, the recording of domestic abuse disclosures in primary care settings should be monitored and compliance with NICE and RCGP guidance should be quality assured.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

The Community Safety Partnership should develop specific information campaigns and support services for families, friends and colleagues of male victims of domestic abuse. This should include guidance that clearly describes the signposts to relevant and appropriate services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership | NHS England

The Community Safety Partnership should correspond with NHS England requesting that they review the domestic abuse risk assessment tools that are applied in A&E settings and consider adopting an abridged Risk Identification Checklist (RIC) assessment to be provided in A&E settings.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗