About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Somerset review

CSP: Somerset Published: June 2023 Year of death: 2017 Extracted: 26 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified systemic failures in recognising and responding to domestic abuse for a vulnerable victim with complex needs, including inconsistent information sharing, inadequate risk assessment, and gaps in multi-agency support. Barriers to accessing help, such as potential gender bias and lack of community awareness, were also noted.

Home Office classifications

27 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - died by suicide
  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - substance misuse
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - self harm
  • Victim - suicidal thoughts
  • Victim - suicide attempts
  • Victim - referred to marac at any time
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

26 recommendations pulled from the report · 22 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Safer Somerset Partnership

Reinforce the need for professionals to proactively consider Care Needs, Safeguarding and Mental Capacity in their deliberations in respect of abusive relationships.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Safer Somerset Partnership

Empower professionals to recognize, respond and report Domestic Abuse, encouraging professional curiosity through an ‘open mind’ and ‘investigative mindset’.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Safer Somerset Partnership

Strengthen professionals understanding of the effect on risk of victims who suffer from substance misuse and mental health issues.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Safer Somerset Partnership | Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group

To strengthen the Partnership approach to Domestic Abuse risk management. Including a review of the local Marac, ensuring GP involvement, policies in respect of repeat occurrences and enhancing the application of tactical options to combat multiple risks, including suicidal ideation.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Safer Somerset Partnership

To systemise the approach to vulnerable adults who don’t meet the threshold for MARAC and/or Safeguarding when dealing with complex individuals who present multiple vulnerability factors, taking into account guidance in respect of “What to do if it’s not Safeguarding”, the “Missing and Vulnerable to Exploitation Panel” and in so doing determine the role of ‘One Teams’.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Safer Somerset Partnership

To address the potential barriers identified in this review to victims of Domestic Abuse face in seeking support from agencies. This includes training to reduce gender bias by professionals.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Safer Somerset Partnership

To raise awareness across the ‘Safety Net’ of community organisations of where to seek support in respect of Domestic Abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.1.2

Addressed to Avon and Somerset Police

Guidance on ‘Situational violence’ to be added to current DA procedural guidance; to include information on screening techniques (February 2018)

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.1.3

Addressed to Avon and Somerset Police

The Force should take further steps to raise awareness of male victims of DA and also make officers aware of their own possible unconscious biases in circumstances involving male victims. The force should also undertake checking and testing to see whether male victims of DA are currently receiving expected standards of service by the Force. (April 2018)

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.2.1

Addressed to Somerset County Council Adult Social Care

Enhanced Information sharing by auditing referral routes and ensuring Social Care Representation at MARAC

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.2.3

Addressed to Somerset County Council Adult Social Care

Understand the availability of domestic abuse support resources for males in Somerset and disseminate this to Safeguarding and locality teams

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.4.1

Addressed to Somerset Integrated Domestic Abuse Service (Live West)

Ensure that staff complete fuller case notes to fully demonstrate the action they are taking and why.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.5.1

Addressed to Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

When CMHT’s receive referrals from SDAS, to contact referrer to discuss whether joint assessment with SDAS could be offered.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.5.2

Addressed to Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

During Court Assessment and Advice Service (CAAS) assessment when it becomes apparent that there is a victim of domestic abuse perpetrated by the client they are assessing, for CAAS to check with Police that the victim (who CAAS would not have contact with) has had an ACPO DASH completed and been referred to domestic abuse support services as applicable.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.5.3

Addressed to Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Reiterate to CAAS in all instances where domestic abuse is suspected during CAAS assessment/contact, and/or Minor Injuries Unit (MIU) contact, staff to offer to undertake DASH with patient if patient is suspected victim of domestic abuse. If DASH declined by patient, CAAS/MIU to give contact details for domestic abuse support services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.5.4

Addressed to Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Encourage all staff working in acute settings to be familiar with the Dual Diagnosis Policy and to attend Dual Diagnosis training as applicable.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.6.1

Addressed to Somerset Drug and Alcohol Service (SDAS)

SDAS staff to consider using the DASH form as a risk assessment tool as well as a referral tool and to explain to clients that completion of a DASH form does not have to automatically trigger a referral into SIDAS but can be used simply to indicate risk level and for further discussion with the client.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.8.1

Addressed to Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

Reiterate message within Emergency Department (ED) regarding substance misuse as indicator of increase risk of vulnerability alongside recognising victims of domestic abuse in male patients and following correct processes associated with this.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.8.2

Addressed to Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

Re-emphasize need for professional curiosity particularly when patient flagged as domestic abuse victim and presents with assault injuries to ED.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.8.3

Addressed to Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

Think family approach to be embedded in ED and safeguarding training across TST, professional curiosity when aggressive behaviour demonstrated and flag on system re MARAC.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.8.4

Addressed to Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

Review how MARAC related information is recorded by safeguarding service on MAXIMS /EPRO to be most useful / available to staff to access.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9.9.1

Addressed to Yarlington Housing

Diary sheets will be reviewed in conjunction with other diary sheets/ incidents to enable a holistic view of the case.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗