About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Bristol review

CSP: Bristol Published: May 2023 Year of death: 2016 Extracted: 10 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified systemic issues including inconsistent and incomplete risk assessments, fragmented information sharing across and within agencies, and challenges in the victim's engagement due to distrust of services. It also highlighted limited focus on the perpetrator's interventions and the need for a lead professional in complex domestic abuse cases.

Home Office classifications

35 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - died by suicide
  • Victim - substance misuse
  • Victim - housing issues
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - psychosis
  • Victim - suicidal thoughts
  • Victim - suicide attempts
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Victim - referred to marac at any time
  • Victim - case heard at marac before homicide
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - attended perpetrator programme
  • Perpetrator - supervised by probation services
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - family attended dhr panel
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
  • DHR process - probation services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

10 recommendations pulled from the report · 2 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Bristol City Council Children’s Services

A review of the running of meetings by Children’s Services

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Multiple agencies

Each agency involved in information sharing from multi agency meetings to dip sample a small number of cases to identify how the information gets shared and whether it is readily available to frontline workers to enable and inform operational activity

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Bristol Community Safety Partnership

Having an identified single individual/agency who can act as ‘Lead’ for certain domestic abuse victims may result in better assessment and therefore management of risk towards them

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Bristol Community Safety Partnership

Review not only what recommendations have been made and completed by DHR’s in Bristol, but also what difference that has made

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Bristol Community Safety Partnership

The CSP to have evidence based data on where to best apply limited resources

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Bristol Community Safety Partnership

The RSVP work locally with perpetrators of domestic abuse is limited in the number of people it can work with and is short term funded. A proper review of the performance of this scheme in reducing re-offending should be undertaken

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Bristol Community Safety Partnership

A review of current practice by dip sampling of a number of risk assessments across all agencies to assess accuracy, necessity and what was changed as a result

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Bristol Community Safety Partnership

The concept of having a lead agency/professional for certain individuals based on the risk to them or the complexity of issues affecting their lives is one that is recommended for consideration by the CSP

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Home Office

It is requested that the Home Office review both the title of such reviews and the content of its Guidance document

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 10

Addressed to Home Office | National Probation Service

The Home Office, with the National Probation Service, should review current practices in sentencing to establish whether best practice is being followed to allow proper time to provide effective rehabilitation.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗