About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Norfolk review

CSP: Norfolk Published: May 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 10 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review highlights significant gaps in inter-agency information sharing, particularly between police/MARAC and health services, impacting risk assessment and coordinated support for the victim. Challenges in victim engagement due to co-existing domestic abuse, mental ill-health, and substance misuse, alongside practical barriers, also hindered effective intervention.

Home Office classifications

36 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - died by suicide
  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - substance misuse
  • Victim - housing issues
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - anxiety
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - self harm
  • Victim - suicide attempts
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Victim - referred to marac at any time
  • Victim - case heard at marac before homicide
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - housing issues
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to housing services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

10 recommendations pulled from the report · 7 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Home Office

The Home Office Multi-agency Statutory Guidance for the Conduct of Domestic Homicide Reviews Section 2 subsection 4 should be amended to specifically include GP practices as having a duty to participate in a Domestic Homicide Review and to have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to NHS England

A clause should be added to the NHS GP contract to stipulate their active participation in Domestic Homicide Reviews and Safeguarding Adult Reviews

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Professional Bodies

That Intercollegiate Guidance for adult safeguarding which informs national training should include specific focus on domestic abuse including the Home Office definition of domestic abuse31, recognition of risk, and a process to escalate those risks and concerns.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Norfolk County Community Safety Partnership

The MARAC process should be reviewed to ensure that information concerning risk relevant to the service user is passed safely and promptly to any services to which they have been referred, as well as their GP practice.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Norfolk County Community Safety Partnership | Norfolk Constabulary | Local Authority Housing Departments

A multi-agency protocol should be put in place to set out a process for sharing information with partner agencies when a Domestic Violence Prevention Notice or Prevention Order is being considered and/or put in place to support effective implementation and monitoring of the Order.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to NHS Norfolk and Waveney ICB | Norfolk County Council

Mental ill health, depression or anxiety presentations to GPs, other health and social care practitioners and wider partners should ensure that the known links between these conditions and domestic abuse are recognised and that:
• assessments include sensitive routine enquiry about domestic abuse
• appropriate action is taken if abuse is identified

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Norfolk Domestic Abuse & Sexual Violence Board

The Domestic Abuse & Sexual Violence Board to form a working and consultation group to examine the most practical and effective method of supporting GPs and their clinical staff to:
• implement a system of identification and risk assessment for patients who disclose, or who may be experiencing domestic abuse
• ensure a process for referring to specialist support and safety planning
• explore feasibility of providing in-house counselling services

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Norfolk County Community Safety Partnership | NHS Norfolk and Waveney ICB | Norfolk County Council

Learning from this Review should be disseminated and generate a review of service delivery to those with the coexisting issues of domestic abuse, mental ill-health, and/or substance misuse, and be informed by service users themselves. The aims of this review should include:
• coordinating service provision to improve access and engagement
• ways and means of maintaining active engagement of the service user through the most appropriate agency and means of contact
• developing a clear policy for how to deal with non-attendance or failed contact, with a process for escalation where this gives cause for concern
• Consideration of referral to Adult Safeguarding.
(The review may wish to consider the whole system and holistic approach advocated by Alcohol Concern's Blue Light Project).

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Norfolk & Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust

The Norfolk & Suffolk Foundation Trust to ensure that the Safeguarding Team have access to all patient record systems to effectively identify when a patient has been referred to any branch of their service and to MARAC, and to alert the service of the MARAC referral and outcome quickly to ensure appropriate and timely services to high risk victims of domestic abuse

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 10

Addressed to Norfolk & Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust | NHS Norfolk and Waveney ICB

The Trust should work together with CCGs to review the referral timescale choices to provide appropriate and timely options for referrers and their patients and to ensure that this is communicated to front line practices.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗