About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Rochdale review

CSP: Rochdale Published: April 2023 Extracted: 5 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identifies that agencies focused on the perpetrator's mental health and vulnerability, leading to missed opportunities for earlier criminal justice intervention for escalating harassment. There was a lack of suitable services for individuals without a formal mental disorder diagnosis who resisted engagement, and family input into assessments was limited.

Home Office classifications

21 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - housing issues
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to mental health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - family attended dhr panel
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

5 recommendations pulled from the report

Recommendation i

Addressed to Rochdale MDOP (now MVOP)

Rochdale MDOP (now MVOP) reviews its policies so as to ensure the appropriate balance is achieved between the mental health and/or other needs of an offender and the point at which their behaviour ceases to be capable of being managed outside the criminal justice system;

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation ii

Addressed to Rochdale MDOP (now MVOP)

Rochdale MDOP (now MVOP) explore opportunities to work with voluntary and third sector organisations that can provide support and services to those with mental vulnerabilities and with whom statutory agencies do not have the capacity or grounds to engage or clients are reluctant to engage with.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation iii

Addressed to Rochdale MVOP panel

Rochdale MVOP panel to amend its practice and criteria to reflect the GMPs guidance in order to operate as the Mentally Vulnerable Offenders Panel (MVOP)

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation iv

Addressed to Rochdale Safer Communities Partnership

That Rochdale Safer Communities Partnership commission research through their partners in health to determine whether the involvement of family members in mental health assessments would be helpful.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation v

Addressed to the institution where the perpetrator is detained and receiving treatment

In order to help practitioners understand the perpetrator’s behaviour when he committed this offence it will be helpful at the appropriate stage to provide the institution where he is detained and receiving treatment with a copy of this report.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗