About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Greenwich review

CSP: Greenwich Published: April 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 5 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
This DHR identifies a lack of agency involvement and missed opportunities to recognise high-risk behaviours, including coercive control, stalking, and the victim's fear, which were not identified by family, friends, or professionals. It also highlights difficulties in obtaining information from private organisations for the review process.

Home Office classifications

28 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - depression
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - physical disability
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - serious or life limiting illness
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - stalking
  • Aggravating factors - physical stalking
  • Aggravating factors - digital stalking
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - family attended dhr panel
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

5 recommendations pulled from the report · 2 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to GP services

Routine Enquiry should be encouraged in GP consultations where individuals present with any complaint which is commonly related to domestic abuse; for example, depression.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to The Law Society

The Law Society be formally approached to discuss such a national code, and production of an advice leaflet, or use of leaflets produced by local DA services related specifically to separation.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Government | Local Authorities

A public awareness campaign which focuses on recognizing that some behaviours are concerning especially during a separation (suicide threats, stalking etc).

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to GP services | CCG

The CCG is already aware of IRIS. GP services could also consider adopting a DA champion scheme where a named individual at the surgery could co-ordinate information, leaflets and posters etc. and potentially, seek extra specific training.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Home Office

that the Home Office make clear where agencies or organisations should help DHRs. The Home Office could give guidance to private companies making clear if there are any obligations, or a code of practice which may help reviews gain crucial information.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗