About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Epping Forest review

CSP: Epping Forest Published: April 2023 Year of death: 2012 Extracted: 14 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified failures in inter-agency information sharing and risk assessment procedures, particularly between police forces, which led to the perpetrator's extensive criminal history not being considered. It also highlighted the absence of clear mechanisms for third-party reporting of domestic abuse and the victim's underestimation of the danger.

Home Office classifications

32 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to workplace (employer) as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - stalking
  • Aggravating factors - physical stalking
  • Aggravating factors - digital stalking
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - probation services recommendations
  • DHR process - school recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

14 recommendations pulled from the report · 7 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation R1.

Addressed to Essex Probation Trust

The findings of Domestic Homicide reviews to be made available to relevant staff across the Trust.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R3.

Addressed to Essex Probation Trust

An accurate Risk of Serious Harm to be completed and retained on the case record. This must take into account the offender’s previous convictions and other relevant material from the case file.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R4.

Addressed to Essex Probation Trust

No violent offender to be assessed as low risk of harm without the endorsement of a manager.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R5.

Addressed to Essex Probation Trust

Requirement Officers to only to hold singleton unpaid work orders which are assessed as low risk of harm.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R6.

Addressed to Norfolk and Suffolk Probation Trust

That the NSPT Procedure Note relating to the External Transfer of Cases to be revised to include instructions to staff to retain a skeleton hard copy file in all cases where the matter is transferred to another Trust.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R7.

Addressed to Directorate of Schools, Children and Families, Essex County Council

The Director of Learning to provide briefings and learning opportunities for schools and academies on the outcome of this review with a focus on the school role in identifying domestic abuse, the impact on children and protective factors.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R8.

Addressed to East of England Ambulance Service

Details of service users to be recorded by name and gender in all ambulance attendances

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R9.

Addressed to all agencies

that all agencies share domestic violence reports with both the victim’s and the suspected perpetrator’s GP.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R10.

Addressed to all GP practices

that all GP practices undertake a review of the training provided to their medical and administrative staff.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R11

Addressed to all relevant agencies

A common system be developed for all relevant agencies to allow third party reporting of domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R12.

Addressed to schools and colleges

Immediate action be taken to improve safeguarding training relating to domestic abuse in schools and colleges

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R13.

Addressed to ACPO | Home Office

That the practice of co-locating of police, domestic abuse, child abuse, and adult abuse staff with professionals from Children’s Services, Advocacy, Health and Probation in the Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (as is the practice with the Norfolk Constabulary) be considered for adoption countrywide.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R14.

Addressed to police investigating team

A member of the police investigating team to attend a review panel meeting at the earliest opportunity after the legal proceedings had been completed,

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗