About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review
Dorset review
CSP: DorsetPublished: April 2023Year of death: 2012Extracted: 11 recs
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
The review highlights a lack of understanding of child-to-parent abuse, inconsistent multi-agency information sharing, and failures in assessing the perpetrator's mental health and educational needs. It also notes a missed opportunity to recognise adolescent neglect and assess the victim's risk.
Home Office classifications
30 tags
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
Victim - mental ill health
Victim - depression
Victim - serious or life limiting illness
Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
Children - living with victim (including adult children)
Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
Child - primary address same as victim
Perpetrator - case heard in court
Perpetrator - issued life sentence
Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
Perpetrator - substance misuse
Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Aggravating factors - separation
Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
DHR process - family contributed to dhr
DHR process - family received draft report
DHR process - social services recommendations
DHR process - health services recommendations
DHR process - school recommendations
DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
DHR process - policy recommendation themes
DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
Extracted recommendations
11 recommendations pulled from the report · 2 matched to organisations in the index
Addressed to
Dorset Safeguarding Children Board | Dorset Community Safety Partnership
Dorset Safeguarding Children Board and the Dorset Community Safety Partnership should work together to develop a strategy which provides a clear pathway for intervention, taking account of the needs of the parent and the child.
Addressed to
Dorset Safeguarding Children Board | Dorset Community Safety Partnership
Practitioners working with children and adults should receive information about parent abuse and appropriate structures and tools to assist their practice.
Dorset Safeguarding Children Board should promote a greater understanding of the signs, indicators and impact of adolescent neglect, and the potential confusion between expected adolescent behaviour and behaviour resulting from compromised parenting.
Dorset Safeguarding Children Board should work with partner agencies to ensure that senior managers are clear with front line staff about the expected response to adolescent neglect and that this is taken into account when reviewing priorities and resources.
The strategy for the delivery of CAMHS services across Dorset should be reviewed in line with the recommendations of Lord Carlile’s review of The Edlington case with a view to developing links between Children’s Services and CAMHS to achieve the best possible assessment and response to conduct disorder.
Addressed to
Dorset Children’s Services | Youth Offending Team
Children’s Services should promote assessment practice within Children’s Social Care and YOT that gathers information about family history and background from the young person themselves as well as significant family members.
Children’s Services should ensure that a full assessment that addresses risk issues is carried out for any pupil whom it has been impossible to engage in education. This should take account of any known information from Education, Social Care, YOT and health organisations.
The importance of the current GP self-assessment tool implemented by NHS Dorset should be reinforced in respect of question 13, which focuses on linking family members within GP records.
The Community Safety Partnership in Dorset should request that the MARAC Steering Group review the MARAC Operating Protocol in order to ensure that they address the use of MARAC in situations of parent abuse.
The Chair of the Community Safety Partnership should bring the findings of this review to the attention of the MARAC Steering Group who will liaise with CAADA (Co-ordinated Action Against Domestic Abuse) to inform national guidelines.