About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Newham review

CSP: Newham Published: April 2023 Year of death: 2014 Extracted: 9 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified missed opportunities for statutory agencies to routinely inquire about domestic abuse during healthcare appointments and police visits. Challenges in engaging immigration services and the perpetrator's coercion related to visa applications were also noted.

Home Office classifications

26 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Victim - immigration involvement
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - immigration involvement
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - stalking
  • Aggravating factors - physical stalking
  • Aggravating factors - digital stalking
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

9 recommendations pulled from the report · 6 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to All agencies

All agencies report progress on their internal action plans generated by this Review to the CSP

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Newham CCG | Barts Health

Newham CCG and Barts Health should ensure that all G.P.s, Sexual Health Services and gynaecology services are routinely enquiring about domestic and sexual violence. This is of particular importance when registering new patients. There should be clear pathways for referral to domestic abuse services and MARAC. This should be monitored by regular audit and reporting performance on MARAC and Domestic and Sexual Violence referrals to the Newham Domestic and Sexual Violence Board

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to London Borough of Newham | Newham CCG

The London Borough of Newham and Newham CCG provide publicity and information leaflets for public facing health services on domestic abuse. This should be targeted at immigrant women to ensure they know their rights and that services believe victims of domestic and sexual violence. This will extend to the Open Doors Service at Homerton Hospital.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Metropolitan Police Service

The Metropolitan Police Service review protocols and training for visits to licenced premises where sex workers are present. They should ensure that all staff are appropriately trained to deliver information and support on sexual and domestic violence. This training should ensure an awareness of sexual and domestic violence protocols and the provision of Health Services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to National Ugly Mugs Scheme

The Ugly Mugs website is seen as a valuable service that has the confidence of sex workers in reporting attacks by strangers and clients. National Ugly Mugs Scheme should be asked to review how links can be made to domestic abuse services and encourage reporting on the national website. This could provide a pathway to local domestic and sexual violence services for this hard to reach group.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to London Borough of Newham | Newham CCG

London Borough of Newham and Newham CCG to review how the issue of domestic abuse and relationships can be incorporated into the process of registration and review with GPs, Sexual Health and Genitourinary Services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Home Office | NHS England

The Home office and NHS England can jointly consider how good practice developed at Open Doors can be implemented in other areas. This would include the development of ISVA services specifically for sex workers and reporting protocols with police services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to London Borough of Newham Community Safety Partnership

The London Borough of Newham Community Safety Partnership develop a strategy to engage with immigrant women to ensure that they understand legal rights in the UK and understand the law and reporting processes in the area of domestic and sexual violence.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Home Office

The Home Office consider advising that each Community Safety Partnership consider inviting the Immigration Service as associate members to local boards.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗