About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Aylesbury Vale review

CSP: Aylesbury Vale Published: April 2023 Year of death: 2018 Extracted: 9 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identifies concerns regarding the family's social isolation, lack of engagement with universal services, and the failure of Children's Social Care to adequately investigate safeguarding concerns. It highlights gaps in national guidance for Elective Home Education and the need for increased public awareness of coercive control.

Home Office classifications

25 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - immigration involvement
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

9 recommendations pulled from the report · 3 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation Panel Recommendation

Addressed to Home Office

The Home Office reviews the existing Domestic Homicide Review Guidance (2016) particularly the current suggested guidance for the timeframes to complete a homicide review. New guidance should also give more specific guidance to Police Services and other key agencies about the completion of IMRs to ensure they are completed fully from the outset which would assist in speeding up the Review process.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Panel Recommendation

Addressed to Department for Education

The Department for Education, as a minimum, implement changes to the Elective Home Education guidance following their Children not in Education consultation, which places a duty on parents to register their child with their Local Authority when home educating

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Panel Recommendation

Addressed to Department for Education

The Elective Home Education guidance following their Children not in Education consultation, should add giving Local Authorities the right to see the child and their home environment to further safeguard children.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Panel Recommendation

Addressed to Buckinghamshire Domestic Abuse Strategy Group

The Buckinghamshire Domestic Abuse Strategy Group undertakes public awareness raising about coercive and controlling behaviour. As a minimum there should be an action appended to the current action plan which lays out a publicity campaign around coercive control using existing media platforms.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Panel Recommendation

Addressed to Buckinghamshire Domestic Abuse Strategy Group

The Buckinghamshire Domestic Abuse Strategy Group ensures that any future professionals’ training in respect to coercive and controlling behaviour includes awareness raising and recognition of the impacts that there might be on the children who live with a controlling parent or parents.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Recommendation 1 - B

Addressed to Buckinghamshire Education Service

Continue to ensure schools and staff are fully informed of Elective Home Education Guidance and procedures (Schools Web is to be kept up to date). Regular bulletin article reminding schools of their statutory responsibility

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Recommendation 2 - B

Addressed to Buckinghamshire Education Service

Reports are analysed in a timely manner to identify any young people for whom we do not have a registered school base or an Elective Home Education base. Reports to include children on the data base for whose education base was closed before they become statutory school age.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Recommendation 3 - B

Addressed to Buckinghamshire Education Service

Devise an external training programme to ensure all partner agencies are aware of Elective Home Education guidance and inform the Local Authority if they are made aware a child is being home educated.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation Recommendation for B

Addressed to Buckinghamshire Children’s Social Care

Processes in MASH and First Response will be reviewed by the Head of Service to ensure staff have due regard to the potential risks that home schooling and lack of engagement with universal services may have on the safety and welfare of children.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗