About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review
Hackney review
CSP: HackneyPublished: April 2023Year of death: 2014Extracted: 17 recs
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
The review identifies systemic failures by the Metropolitan Police Service, including poor performance and understaffing in the Community Safety Unit, leading to critical errors, omissions, and inadequate supervision in a domestic abuse investigation. Poor communication also impacted the emergency response.
Home Office classifications
32 tags
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
Children - living with victim (including adult children)
Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
Child - primary address same as victim
Perpetrator - case heard in court
Perpetrator - issued life sentence
Perpetrator - substance misuse
Perpetrator - housing issues
Perpetrator - serious or life limiting illness
Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Aggravating factors - separation
Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
Aggravating factors - economic abuse
DHR process - family contributed to dhr
DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
DHR process - family received draft report
DHR process - family attended dhr panel
DHR process - police recommendations
DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
DHR process - training recommendation themes
DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
DHR process - other recommendation themes
Extracted recommendations
17 recommendations pulled from the report · 15 matched to organisations in the index
The MPS should ensure that the risk assessment section of the planned mobile data replacement for Report Book 124D includes clear guidance and prompts to officers that any response by a domestic abuse survivor in the affirmative must also contain a full explanation of context and meaning as well as a requirement for primary supervision actions to be recorded
Any threat to life in a domestic abuse context must be reviewed by an inspector who will be responsible for implementing and directing actions in line with the threat to life policy
First and second line managers have demonstrably undertaken their primary supervision duties before the report can be allocated for secondary investigation by the CSU while ensuring that this not cause delay to the investigation
When children are named as potential victims, witnesses or are living in the household, a pre-assessment checklist has been generated and shared with Children’s Services
System generated reminders for CSU investigations should be diverted for remedial action (and not just copied) to the next line manager when an officer is absent for any period longer than seven days
The MPS should review its Human Resources support system to ensure that a report of staff absence in a CSU through work-related stress will prompt an immediate review of the officer’s work file on CRIS and clear accountability transferred and monitored by the next level of supervision until return to duty
Addressed to
Metropolitan Police Service (Hackney Borough Police) | City and Hackney Safeguarding Children Board
To provide reassurance and improve confidence in the system for safeguarding children and young people, the MPS in Hackney should report to the City and Hackney Safeguarding Children Board that all failed processes have been rectified and appropriate checks and balances are in place in line with the actions arising from this review
Research should be commissioned by the College of Policing in consultation with specialists such as Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) organisations to identify a model for safe exit planning. Specialist advice would also be sought from the MPS Hostage and Crisis Unit, which have expertise in ‘deadline’ management. Such research may improve the assessment of risk within the National Decision Model (NDM).
It is recommended that officers are reminded of the necessity to explore, clarify and record information when victims provide positive responses during the DASH risk assessment process
It is recommended that officers are reminded of the necessity to complete MERLIN/PAC reports in relation to all cases of Domestic Abuse where there are children within the family
Addressed to
Metropolitan Police Service (Hackney Borough Police) | City and Hackney Safeguarding Children Board
Hackney Borough Police ensure their front-line staff have access to and attend multi-agency training delivered by the City and Hackney Safeguarding Children Board to further promote their understanding of partnership working and the role of other agencies in protecting children and young people from harm (see recommendation 4).
Victim Codes of Practice One tool used by the MPS to track the progress of open crimes is the Victim Codes of Practice (VCoP). The VCoP is essentially a record of when the victim of any reported crime was last contacted by an officer. At present, a successful contact includes a voicemail being left on a victim’s given phone number. However, there is no way of the police knowing whether or not the victim has heard a voicemail, or whether the alleged aggressor has accessed the voicemail. The IPCC recommends that a successful contact should, at the minimum, be recorded where an officer has managed to talk to the victim and verify their identity and welfare
Details needed by police when attending incidents During subject interviews it became obvious to the IPCC that there was a discrepancy between the level of detail police require when responding to an incident and the level of detail the control room feel necessary to include in the remarks of the CAD. It is the view of the IPCC that had more detail from the call of Daughter A been recorded, the attending officers would have had a better understanding of the situation than they did on that late March morning in 2014. The IPCC recommends that part of the training regarding relaying details to police officers attending incidents focuses the quality of this information, particularly where the information has come from a third party – for example stating explicitly how the incident location has ascertained in the remarks section of the CAD and gaining more detail from the informant about critical information if possible
Minutes from Daily Intelligence Meetings During its investigation, the IPCC was unable to verify whether or not CRIS 4603***/14 was discussed during any of the Daily Intelligence Meetings held. The IPCC recommends that at the bare minimum a list of the cases discussed during these meetings is recorded – ideally with actions and who they are assigned to
Staffing within Community Safety Units During its investigation the IPCC came to the conclusion that MPS Hackney borough CSU was left understaffed following the implementation of the LPM. It is recommended that the MPS ensures that it has processes in place to consider resourcing of domestic violence units is adequate in light of demand levels and its responsibilities under the Public Sector Equality Duty