About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Stoke-on-Trent review

CSP: Stoke-on-Trent Published: April 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 8 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified systemic failures in multi-agency safeguarding responses, including inadequate professional oversight in Adult Social Care, poor inter-agency communication, and a lack of awareness regarding the perpetrator's deteriorating mental health and its impact on the victim, particularly in the context of Folie imposée.

Home Office classifications

35 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - suicidal thoughts
  • Victim - serious or life limiting illness
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - was a carer
  • Perpetrator - carer for victim
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - panic attacks
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

8 recommendations pulled from the report · 6 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 8.74

Addressed to Stoke-on-Trent City Council

That Stoke-on-Trent City Council review and monitor the effectiveness of their arrangements for professional oversight of the Adult Social Care access point and for referrers wishing to discuss their concerns with a Social Worker to be afforded that opportunity.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8.75

Addressed to Stoke-on-Trent Responsible Authorities Group

That the Stoke-on-Trent Responsible Authorities Group includes within the dissemination of learning from this Review a strand which promotes health professional awareness of Folie imposée and its safeguarding implications.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8.76

Addressed to Stoke-on-Trent Responsible Authorities Group

That the Stoke-on-Trent responsible Authorities Group refer carer strain in older people to the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness as a suggested topic for examination within their research programme.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation NHS England 1

Addressed to NHS England

All correspondence from GPs when requested to be sent by fax to Adult Social Care/Safeguarding be scanned into records and confirmation received by Social services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation NHS England 2

Addressed to NHS England

Advise the GP surgery to review the criteria used to determine when to make a Safeguarding referral when there are concerns about a patient whose health and or vulnerability is impacting upon another vulnerable person with care and support needs

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation NHS England 3

Addressed to NHS England

Advise that Safeguarding Training undertaken in primary care includes information on how a vulnerable adult looking after another vulnerable adult has the potential to increase risks and need for care and support.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation NHS England 4

Addressed to NHS England

Advise GP primary care practice meetings to discuss the theme of safeguarding when reflecting on the needs of patients who are a cause of concern.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SSSHFT 1

Addressed to South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Develop a field for “address for communication” on the Rio (electronic patient record) system.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗