About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Kent review

CSP: Kent Published: April 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 6 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
Systemic failings in inter-agency information sharing, risk assessment, and mental health care coordination, particularly post-absolute discharge, contributed to the homicide. Key concerns include insufficient family engagement, unverified risk disclosure to partners, and inadequate staff governance.

Home Office classifications

18 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Perpetrator - serious or life limiting illness
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - family attended dhr panel
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

6 recommendations pulled from the report · 4 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to NHS England

Secure Units and other similar establishments should ensure that there is a process of effective communication between them, the Police and other appropriate agencies regarding reporting assaults in their establishments. This must include the local authority where assaults occur in hospitals between patients.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to NHS England

Whenever there is a significant change of circumstance, such as a change of relationship, or any significant change of circumstance for those under supervision on conditional discharge, then a multi–agency meeting should be initiated and as a result to take and record any action that is required, the person(s) responsible for actions and time scale for completion.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to KMPT

Where there are concerns in regard to family members raised within a team meeting or any other internal setting then those issues should be clarified. The proposed course of action to manage this position should be set out in the form of an action plan, which should indicate the action required, the responsible member of staff, timescale for action and thereafter feedback on the engagement with the family and the outcomes recorded.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to SoS

That the process of Mental Health Tribunal Review hearing applications for Absolute Discharge be reviewed to ensure that current arrangements are adequate to provide the panel with the appropriate breadth of information needed to reach their decision. Such changes should also consider how best to receive intelligence/information from the family.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to SoS

Where an agency expresses a view as to the decision a Mental Health Tribunal should consider, then, such a view must be supported with a rationale, either in person or in the form of documentary evidence.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to NHS England

That the NHS Trust, in light of the findings of their investigation, further consider whether the management and governance arrangements currently in place were effective and consider how lessons learnt from this review can be applied for the future.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗