About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review
St Helens review
CSP: St HelensPublished: December 2022Year of death: 2018Extracted: 11 recs
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
The review highlights missed opportunities by agencies to conduct comprehensive risk assessments, particularly regarding the perpetrator's controlling behaviour and the victim's vulnerability. Insufficient information sharing and contextualisation of risk led to the MARAC being poorly informed, compounded by the victim's reluctance to report due to fear of losing her children.
Home Office classifications
38 tags
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
Victim - housing issues
Victim - mental ill health
Victim - post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd)
Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
Victim - referred to marac at any time
Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
Children - removed into care
Perpetrator - case heard in court
Perpetrator - issued life sentence
Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
Perpetrator - substance misuse
Perpetrator - housing issues
Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to mental health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - attended drug and alcohol services
Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
Aggravating factors - stalking
Aggravating factors - digital stalking
Aggravating factors - honour based violence
Aggravating factors - sexual abuse
Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
Aggravating factors - physical abuse
DHR process - family contributed to dhr
DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
DHR process - police recommendations
DHR process - social services recommendations
DHR process - health services recommendations
DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
DHR process - housing services recommendations
DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
DHR process - training recommendation themes
DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
Extracted recommendations
11 recommendations pulled from the report · 6 matched to organisations in the index
All organisations represented at this Review inform and educate staff about the need to recognise and actively investigate the level of control and coercion present within an intimate relationship.
Addressed to
St Helens Peoples Board | Home Office
Education and marketing must take place both nationally and locally. To raise awareness about control and coercion within an abusive intimate relationship and when people choose to avoid reporting incidents to Authorities, to inform them about the wide range of other bodies and pathways which remain open to report incidents of domestic abuse.
Addressed to
St Helens Peoples Board | Home Office
When assessing the level of risk that a domestic abuse incident presents do not view the incident in isolation consider instead the context in which that incident and the victim exists. Whilst it is vital that this consideration is made at a local level the Panel believe that the importance of assessing contextual risk would also benefit from future reinforcement by Central bodies.
Addressed to
St Helens Clinical Commissioning Group
The Panel acknowledged that within some pockets of the CCG change to deliver a greater level of engagement from G.P. and other Health professionals in taking positive action in risk assessment and information sharing when a patient discloses domestic abuse is required.
In order to facilitate effective risk assessment organisations must acknowledge that staff representing them at MARAC meetings require sufficient time to adequately research cases and individuals before attending the MARAC and afford them that resource.
Refuge’s Casework management policy and effective casework training should be reviewed to ensure that all staff understand the requirement to contact clients following a new referral by another agency.
People being rehoused into St Helens from a neighbouring borough due to Domestic Abuse should be referred direct to the new tenancy officer within the complex needs team at signup.
Staff at MASH should be reminded of the importance of researching the history of parties involved in domestic abuse. In particular ensuring previous addresses are taken into consideration during the risk assessment process.
Consideration should be given to adopting measures to ensure that whenever a victim states they think the perpetrator will kill them one day the comment is recorded on the VPRF1 and its context explored with the victim at the earliest safe opportunity.