About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Tower Hamlets review

CSP: Tower Hamlets Published: December 2022 Year of death: 2018 Extracted: 3 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified systemic missed opportunities by multiple agencies to identify and respond to escalating domestic abuse, coercive control, and stalking. These included failures in information sharing, consistent referral to specialist support, and a lack of mandatory domestic abuse training for front-line staff.

Home Office classifications

38 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - self harm
  • Victim - suicidal thoughts
  • Victim - suicide attempts
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - immigration involvement
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - stalking
  • Aggravating factors - physical stalking
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

3 recommendations pulled from the report

Recommendation 1

Addressed to LB Tower Hamlets | Community Safety Partnership

Review domestic abuse awareness and training for front-line staff (including the wider definition of coercion and control, also its impact on safeguarding children) and devise a programme to ensure it is a mandatory requirement for current and new front-line staff

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to LB Tower Hamlets Children Social Care

Review training programmes to ensure the concept of family group conferences is promoted across agencies

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to LB Tower Hamlets | Registered Providers of Social Housing

Registered Providers of Social Housing should consider the ‘Whole Housing Toolkit’ and Domestic Abuse Housing Alliance (DAHA) accreditation to improve their responses to victims of domestic abuse, in particular to highlight possible indicators of financial/domestic abuse and improve awareness of the support available

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗