About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Brent review

CSP: Brent Published: December 2022 Year of death: 2018 Extracted: 12 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified concerns regarding inconsistent intelligence checks by police, gaps in primary care's management of combat stress and assessment of risk to others, and the perpetrator's selective disclosure of his mental health history, which hindered comprehensive risk assessment by agencies.

Home Office classifications

31 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd)
  • Perpetrator - self harm
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - suicide attempts
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - family attended dhr panel
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - military recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

12 recommendations pulled from the report · 11 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 6.1

Addressed to Ministry of Defence

That the Ministry of Defence identifies a role within the organisation that would act as single point of contact for future DHRs and that this role is sufficiently briefed about the importance of DHRs.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.2.1

Addressed to Metropolitan Police Service | SWBCU

That SWBCU Senior Leadership Team remind officers that they are to complete the required five-year intelligence checks for Domestic Abuse incidents. This should include mandatory searches of databases including PNC, CRIS, MERLIN and CRIMINT ensuring that the intelligence check results are recorded on the CRIS report.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.2.2

Addressed to Metropolitan Police Service | SWBCU

That SWBCU Senior Leadership Team monitor compliance of completed intelligence checks by dip sampling DA flagged CRIS reports.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.3.1

Addressed to Department of Health

That the Department of Health continues to remind primary care providers of the requirement to co-operate with Domestic Homicide Reviews.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.4.1

Addressed to Clinical Commissioning Group

That the CCG raises awareness of the process of engaging primary care in the learning from this review to ensure that each practice can consider the implications and actions to promote ongoing professional development in this area.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.5.1

Addressed to Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust

That formal consideration of risk should take place, not only at the initial assessment but at any review of treatment and at the end of treatment. This would ensure clear documentation of the risk assessment process.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.5.2

Addressed to Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust

That if people are referred from a source other than a GP, then there should be an automatic request to the GP for background information. Information from other sources will be requested depending on individual circumstances.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.5.3

Addressed to Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust

That the Trust should explore whether trainee psychologist entries in electronic clinical records should be validated by their supervisor and the technological feasibility of doing this.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.6.1

Addressed to South West London and St George’s NHS Trust

That all Talk Wandsworth clinicians are reminded of the NHS England guideline and the commitment of the service to prioritise war veterans for treatment at Steps 2 and 3 thereby ensuring minimal waiting times for clients in this group.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.6.2

Addressed to South West London and St George’s NHS Trust

That when veterans or other clients report at the telephone triage or any point during treatment that they have recently stopped or changed their medication, the resulting changes in symptomatology (eg re-emergence of sleep patterns) should be explored and reviewed with the client and their GP should be made aware via a telephone call or letter. In instances when a client reports a significant re-emergence of depression and anxiety symptoms following the discontinuation of or changes to their medication regime, a referral to a secondary care psychiatrist for a medication review should be considered and discussed with the GP.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.7.1

Addressed to Brent Community Safety Partnership

That Brent Community Safety Partnership reviews its engagement with faith groups in the area and identifies where relationships could be strengthened.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.7.2

Addressed to Brent Community Safety Partnership | Clinical Commissioning Group

That Brent Community Safety Partnership works with the Clinical Commissioning Group to ensure that there is clarity about the engagement of primary care with Domestic Homicide Reviews.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗