About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Leicester review

CSP: Leicester Published: December 2022 Year of death: 2017 Extracted: 15 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identifies missed opportunities by agencies to identify and respond to coercive control and domestic abuse, particularly within the Family Court system where the victim was unrepresented. It highlights the enhanced risks at separation, exacerbated by co-habitation and housing issues, and barriers to accessing services due to confidentiality and cultural factors.

Home Office classifications

27 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - housing issues
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to mental health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to other educational institution as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - immigration involvement
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - religious institution recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

15 recommendations pulled from the report · 3 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Safer Leicester Partnership | Leicester Safeguarding Children’s Board

Safer Leicester Partnership should share the findings of this review with the Leicester Safeguarding Children’s Board to highlight all lessons learned through this review specific to children and young people.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Home Office

The Home Office should note the findings of this review as relevant to their development of DVPN’s.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Leicester City Council Education and Children’s Services

Practitioners are aware of their statutory requirement for assessment, and personal curiosity, where a child and young person meets the provision and care cannot be provided by persons with parental responsibility.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Safer Leicester Partnership

The Safer Leicester Partnership should develop links to District Judges who work with domestic abuse victims in the Family Court, through the Family Justice Board or Civil and Criminal Justice Working Group. In particular to ensure a shared understanding of coercive and controlling behaviour, and the agreement to use of undertakings, both of which impact on victim safety and decision making.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Leicester City Council Education and Children’s Services

Both children and adults workers comply with multi-agency procedures to ascertain and record the ethnicity, religious practice and language of families they are involved with and that this is thoroughly considered in the context of assessment of need or risk; and in planning intervention and support.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Safer Leicester Partnership

The Safer Leicester Partnership should develop the inclusion of family lawyers who work with domestic abuse victims in the Family Court, within safeguarding training and information sharing.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Safer Leicester Partnership | Home Office

The Safer Leicester Partnership should consider sharing the findings of this review with the Home Office in support of understanding the complexity of applying for protective orders for victims and for consideration of detailed housing analysis being captured in DHR’s nationally, for potential inclusion as a contributing factor in domestic abuse risk assessments.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Her Majesty’s Court & Tribunal Service

The obtaining of an immediate independent, properly appointed, interpreter, should be reviewed by the local judiciary.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Safer Leicester Partnership | Family Court

The Safer Leicester Partnership should share the findings of this review and develop information sharing protocols with the Family Court to enhance the safety of victims of domestic abuse, and their children.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Safer Leicester Partnership

The Safer Leicester Partnership should continue the awareness work commenced with faith leaders in Leicester City to further explore and inform shared understanding of the community approach in relation to ‘spiritual guidance’ in matters of domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Safer Leicester Partnership

The Safer Leicester Partnership should promote the existence of the revised domestic and sexual violence training programme, especially in relation to understanding and responding to issues of coercive and controlling behaviour, and encourage practitioners to undertake specific training in relation to faith, culture, religion and identity within domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Safer Leicester Partnership | Chamber of Commerce

The Safer Leicester Partnership should share the Public Health England publication ‘Domestic Abuse – a Toolkit for Employers’ with the regional Chamber of Commerce, for wide dissemination within the business community.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 10

Addressed to Safer Leicester Partnership

The Safer Leicester Partnership should ensure the learning points from this review are disseminated widely and incorporated within domestic abuse practice development.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗