About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Enfield review

CSP: Enfield Published: December 2022 Year of death: 2016 Extracted: 8 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review highlights significant failures in inter-agency coordination and information sharing, leading to an uncoordinated response to the victim's complex needs, including mental health, substance misuse, and domestic abuse. Professionals underestimated the perpetrator's coercive control and manipulation, and did not adequately assess the escalating risk to the victim.

Home Office classifications

45 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - substance misuse
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - anxiety
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - panic attacks
  • Victim - psychosis
  • Victim - self harm
  • Victim - suicidal thoughts
  • Victim - suicide attempts
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Victim - referred to marac at any time
  • Victim - case heard at marac before homicide
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - housing issues
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd)
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to probation services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - attended perpetrator programme
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • Perpetrator - supervised by probation services
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - stalking
  • Aggravating factors - digital stalking
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
  • DHR process - probation services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

8 recommendations pulled from the report · 1 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to key agencies within this review

The key agencies within this review must consider how complex cases are managed and report back to the Community Safety Partnership and other senior level Boards by March 2018

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

Within 18 months, the Community Safety Partnership should evaluate whether complex cases are being managed more effectively

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to multi-agency risk assessment conference (MARAC)

The multi-agency risk assessment conference (MARAC) meeting should consider how to share any pertinent information with the relevant GPs

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Violence Against Women and Girls Group

The individual management reviews in this case were particularly poor. The Violence Against Women and Girls Group should consider providing multi-agency training to improve agency's understanding of the process

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Accident and Emergency Departments

Staff in Accident and Emergency Departments should receive training about self-harm and self-harm should be included in all local domestic abuse training. (This should ensure that staff have an understanding of unusual self-inflicted injuries (e.g. the victim's facial injury or 'accidental' injuries)

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

The Community Safety Partnership should consider funding a domestic abuse advocate/educator for the Accident and Emergency Department at North Middlesex Hospital

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Metropolitan Police Service

The victim's mother and daughter had a number of questions they wanted answered about the chain of events following the victim's death (see section 2.2.1.). The Metropolitan Police Service should consider how best to address those questions

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Enfield Community Safety Partnership

Enfield Community Safety Partnership should ask each agency involved in this review to provide feedback on their single agency recommendations.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗