About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Lambeth review

CSP: Lambeth Published: December 2022 Year of death: 2018 Extracted: 18 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified a lack of joined-up agency working, inadequate risk assessment, and missed opportunities in mental health care for the perpetrator, particularly concerning potential child criminal exploitation and familial violence. It also highlighted issues with the police response to domestic abuse reports and potential structural barriers in service engagement.

Home Office classifications

26 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - housing issues
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

18 recommendations pulled from the report · 7 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Safer Lambeth Partnership

The Safer Lambeth Partnership should liaise with Buckinghamshire and Lewisham Children’s Social Care respectively and satisfy itself that Child A and Child B (as well as their families) are in receipt of trauma informed support to cope with both the aftermath of the homicide and the publication of the DHR.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Safer Lambeth Partnership

After publication of this DHR, the Safer Lambeth Partnership should liaise with Buckinghamshire and Lewisham Children’s Social Care respectively and ensure that this report is attached to Child A and Child B’s social care records. This is so that, if they wish to read the DHR when they are older, it will be available to them.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Home Office

The Home Office to work with other government departments to develop a cross-government definition of AFV/CPV. This should include developing policy and practice guidance for AFV and refreshing the current CPV guidance.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Lambeth CCG

The Lambeth CCG to further promote the Living Well Network Hub to ensure that all GPs are aware that mental health referrals should be made via this route.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to MPS

The MPS to undertake a training needs assessment to identify the skills and training that police officers require to respond to AFV/CPV.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to MPS

The MPS to audit the ‘Strengthening Local Policing’ programme’ to ensure it enables a consistent and robust process for the supervision all of domestic abuse incidents / crimes.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to MPS

The MPS to identify the root cause of the delay in the response to Mia’s report and ensure that this is addressed in its IT ‘Changes Project’ in order that such excessive delays cannot occur in the future.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Safer Lambeth Partnership

The Safer Lambeth Partnership to work with local partners to review the findings from this DHR and develop the response to AFV / CPV locally. This should include identifying the actions that agencies can take individually and collectively, as well as completing a training needs assessment to identify the skills and training that professionals require to respond.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Lambeth Together

Lambeth Together to consider the learning from this DHR in relation to meeting the needs of local communities, including the provision of culturally appropriate services, a diverse workforce and creating opportunities to build trust with communities.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R9

Addressed to Hetherington Group Practice

The Practice Domestic Abuse policy needs to be amended to include how the practice will respond if a perpetrator discloses or is registered with the practice, as well as clarifying details of the Practice Domestic Abuse Lead, the local referral pathway and Domestic Abuse training resources.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R10

Addressed to Safer Lambeth Partnership

The Safer Lambeth Partnership to use the learning from this DHR, as well as other local and national research, to work with the MPS to identify how to improve relationships between Black communities and the police.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R11a

Addressed to SLaM LEO CMHT

LEO CMHT to develop a local protocol to state that once an initial assessment has been done, the outcome of the assessment should be discussed at the next MDT meeting and any plans put in place to address the key issues relevant to risk

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R11b

Addressed to SLaM LEO CMHT

LEO CMHT to develop a protocol to state that relatives and patients are to be given a copy of the treatment care plan on the day of the assessment including crisis contact details

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R11d

Addressed to SLaM LEO CMHT

LEO CMHT to develop a consistent approach and framework for conducting assessments including consideration of collateral sources of information

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R12a

Addressed to SLaM

A Trust-wide piece of work to be done to share the learning from other domestic homicide cases that have taken place in the Trust

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R12b

Addressed to SLaM

The Trust should assure itself that all practitioners are sufficiently aware of the need for domestic abuse routine enquiry as part of full needs and risk assessment. The Think Family approach demonstrates that this should not solely focus on service user’s vulnerability, but also carers and other family members, if relevant. Staff should also consider the needs of male victims of domestic abuse

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation R12c

Addressed to SLaM

The Trust should assure itself that staff are aware of the MARAC referral processes, local borough arrangements and the standards expected when there are high risk domestic abuse concerns.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗