COVID-M2.17 Accepted in Part

Public Emergency Information Portal

COVID-19 Inquiry · Module 2: Core Decision-Making · Issued 20 November 2025 · Addressed to: Cabinet Office

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should develop an online portal for use in future civil emergencies, where members of the public can access information on the legal restrictions that apply in their area and any associated guidance.

COVID-19 Inquiry, Module 2: Core Decision-Making · 20 Nov 2025 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees with the aim of making restrictions and guidance accessible but does not agree with the proposed approach of a single online portal (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The response cites information ownership constraints: different communication channels are owned by different bodies, and devolved governments have specific responsibilities.
- The government points to GOV.UK, GOV.UK/Prepare, and the Resilience Direct platform as existing tools.
- Work with devolved governments on crisis communications coordination is planned for 2026, including co-producing shared principles for aligning communications.
- No single repository for restrictions and guidance has been developed.

Response — verbatim from government

Northern Ireland Executive — initial response

No formal response published by this government.

Northern Ireland Executive · 20 Nov 2025

Scottish Government — follow-up

No formal response published by this government.

Scottish Government · 20 Nov 2025

Welsh Government — follow-up

No formal response published by this government.

Welsh Government · 20 Nov 2025

UK Government — follow-up

The government agrees with the Inquiry that it is important that there is a resource, or set of resources, that allows the public to easily access information on legal restrictions and associated guidance that applies in their area during a civil emergency. However, such a tool must account for the complex set of ownerships and responsibilities that apply to various sources of data and communication tools within the UK government and devolved governments, which places constraints on the form that this resource could take.

The government recognises that clarity and accessibility of information are crucial pillars of a crisis communications response, and have a significant impact on compliance with necessary restrictions.

There are already a number of existing tools and capabilities that have been developed to allow the government to quickly and effectively communicate guidance and advice to the public during a civil emergency. The GOV.UK website is a trusted and accessible source for all UK government information that is available for the public, including any guidance that has been published during an emergency, and any legal restrictions that may apply in local areas. There is also more specific information on simple and effective steps that the public can take to improve their preparedness for emergencies on the GOV.UK/Prepare website.

We are also working closely with devolved governments to improve coordination at every stage of the crisis response. In 2026, we will work with partners across the four nations to improve our crisis communications coordination, including by co-producing shared principles for aligning communications during emergencies.

While the government agrees with the aim behind this recommendation, the proposed approach of developing a single online portal may not be the best approach in every emergency. One significant constraint is information ownership, as different communication channels and sources of information will be owned by different bodies. The devolved governments have specific responsibilities, so it would not be appropriate for the UK government to have ownership of crisis communications. Furthermore, there is also evidence that different groups of people trust different sets of resources. A broader set of resources with well-managed content is therefore likely to be a more appropriate way to signpost restrictions and advice during emergencies than a single, individually-owned portal.

UK Government · 20 Nov 2025 Written response →

UK Government — follow-up

The government agrees with the Inquiry that it is important that there is a resource, or set of resources, that allows the public to easily access information on legal restrictions and associated guidance that applies in their area during a civil emergency. However, such a tool must account for the complex set of ownerships and responsibilities that apply to various sources of data and communication tools within the UK government and devolved governments, which places constraints on the form that this resource could take.

The government recognises that clarity and accessibility of information are crucial pillars of a crisis communications response, and have a significant impact on compliance with necessary restrictions.

There are already a number of existing tools and capabilities that have been developed to allow the government to quickly and effectively communicate guidance and advice to the public during a civil emergency. The GOV.UK website is a trusted and accessible source for all UK government information that is available for the public, including any guidance that has been published during an emergency, and any legal restrictions that may apply in local areas. There is also more specific information on simple and effective steps that the public can take to improve their preparedness for emergencies on the GOV.UK/Prepare website.

We are also working closely with devolved governments to improve coordination at every stage of the crisis response. In 2026, we will work with partners across the four nations to improve our crisis communications coordination, including by co-producing shared principles for aligning communications during emergencies.

While the government agrees with the aim behind this recommendation, the proposed approach of developing a single online portal may not be the best approach in every emergency. One significant constraint is information ownership, as different communication channels and sources of information will be owned by different bodies. The devolved governments have specific responsibilities, so it would not be appropriate for the UK government to have ownership of crisis communications. Furthermore, there is also evidence that different groups of people trust different sets of resources. A broader set of resources with well-managed content is therefore likely to be a more appropriate way to signpost restrictions and advice during emergencies than a single, individually-owned portal.

UK Government · 25 Mar 2026 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 20 Nov 2025 Status: Pending. No government response yet received. Module 2 report published 20 November 2025. Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.