Advisory Group Terms of Appointment
COVID-19 Inquiry · Module 2: Core Decision-Making · Issued 20 November 2025 · Addressed to: Government Office for Science
Government responseUK Government: Accepted (Mar 2026)Northern Ireland Executive: Accepted (Mar 2026)Scottish Government: Accepted (Mar 2026)Welsh Government: Accepted (Mar 2026)
DeliveryNo statement from Government Office for Science found
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The Government Office for Science (GO-Science), the Scottish Government, the Welsh Government and the Department of Health (Northern Ireland) should each develop standard terms of appointment for all participants in scientific advisory groups. These terms should include: clarity around the nature of an individual's role and the extent of their responsibility, as well as the likely time commitment; payment where their time commitment means that they have to spend time away from their substantive role; access to support services; and access to advice on personal and online security, with procedures for escalating specific concerns.
COVID-19 Inquiry, Module 2: Core Decision-Making · 20 Nov 2025 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The UK Government (Cabinet Office) stated in March 2026 that the Government Office for Science will review and update terms, conditions, and support for advisory group participants by 2027, including developing guidance on institutional compensation (Cabinet Office response, Mar 2026). Earlier that month, the Northern Ireland Executive, the Scottish Government, and the Welsh Government also accepted the recommendation to establish standard terms of appointment (Welsh Government response, Mar 2026; Scottish Government response, Mar 2026; Northern Ireland Executive response, Mar 2026). The record holds no update since the UK Government (Cabinet Office)'s response of March 2026 (Cabinet Office response, Mar 2026).
Sources
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Government response
●UK Government · Accepted · 25 Mar 2026
GO-Science already provides support to SAGE participants before, during and after any SAGE activation. All SAGE participants receive a guidance document outlining their roles, responsibilities and the support available to them when they are invited to join the SAGE register of experts or to participate in a SAGE meeting. This includes details of the SAGE wellbeing services and direction on how to access them. It also sets out protocols and key principles for media engagement and detailed advice on personal and online security.
GO-Science will review and update the terms, conditions and support for participants by 2027 to ensure they have access to clear, comprehensive and up-to-date information in all the areas listed in the recommendation. As part of this, GO-Science will also develop guidance on when compensation may be applicable for universities, other institutions and private companies whose staff contribute extensively to SAGE during extended activations, resulting in significant time away from their substantive roles. Any compensation mechanism must be transparent and designed to uphold the integrity and independence of SAGE.
Extract from: UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report
●Northern Ireland Executive · Accepted · 18 Mar 2026
Accepted
The CSTA will work with the Department of Health and the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs here to develop standard terms of appointment for all participants in scientific advisory groups, in line with the approach adopted by GO‑Science and other devolved governments.
Extract from: Executive Response to the Covid-19 Module 2 Report March 2026
●Scottish Government · Accepted · 17 Mar 2026
The Scottish Government accepts this recommendation, acknowledging the commitment and contribution of all members of the Scottish Government Covid-19 Advisory Group and other advisory groups, including those individuals already seconded to the Scottish Government as senior scientific advisers.
Developing a more standardised, equitable and transparent approach to terms, conditions and support for all academic and expert advisers invited to scientific advisory groups, including those called in response to emergencies, would provide these expert advisers with consistency and clearer expectations of the implications of advising governments during an emergency. This approach was supported by feedback in discussions with CIREG.
Scientific advisory groups should provide clear, accessible scientific advice that can be readily understood by nontechnical audiences. During emergencies, additional advisory groups are also likely to contribute advice on how the Scottish Government should translate scientific evidence into operational or implementation guidance, taking account of how decisions may affect different groups of people.
These advisory groups may include experts with a wide range of professional backgrounds, lived experience, and representatives of stakeholder communities with shared interests or characteristics. To support all contributors effectively, the Scottish Government will set out principles within guidance for scientific advisory groups. This guidance will help ensure everyone who offers their time, expertise, and insight during emergencies is recognised appropriately for their contributions.
For the Scottish Government, this work will be led by the Office of the CSA, taking account of the experience of colleagues and expert advisers during the pandemic, the inquiry period, and other emergency activations, to ensure an improved offer of support across a number of areas. We will work closely with colleagues in GO-Science and the other devolved governments to help ensure a consistent approach.
Response document: UK Covid-19 Inquiry - Module 2 report: Scottish Government response, page 3
●Welsh Government · Accepted · 16 Mar 2026
1.12. The Welsh Government accepts the Inquiry’s recommendation 5, that it and the other governments should develop standard terms of appointment for all participants in scientific advisory groups. We recognise the huge contribution made by scientific experts, and we deplore the abuse and threats many of them faced, and we agree that the development of standard terms of appointment is essential if experts are to feel confident in supporting the work of governments in tackling future emergencies.
1.13. The Welsh Government agrees that each of the four nations should develop its own terms of appointment, which will enable us to reflect circumstances in each nation, but we also believe that there is a strong case for consistency across the UK. We will therefore work closely with the UK Government Office for Science, the Scottish Government and the Northern Ireland Executive in developing our terms of appointment, with a view to further advice being developed on progress for incoming Welsh Ministers by 30 September 2026.
Extract from: UK Covid-19 Inquiry Modules 2, 2A, 2B, 2C Report (Core decision-making and political governance): Welsh Government response
Delivery
No statement on delivery from Government Office for Science has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.