ANG-14

Public commitment to anti-sexist anti-racist organisation

Angiolini Inquiry · Angiolini Inquiry Part 1 Report · Issued 29 February 2024 · Addressed to: National Police Chiefs Council

Government responseNational Police Chiefs Council: Accepted (Mar 2024)Home Office: Under consideration (Feb 2024)

DeliveryCabinet Office says completed (Oct 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation, Recommendation 14

With immediate effect, every police force should commit publicly to being an anti-sexist, anti-misogynistic, anti-racist organisation in order to address, understand and eradicate sexism, racism and misogyny, contributing to a wider positive culture to remove all forms of discrimination from the profession. This includes properly addressing – and taking steps to root out – so-called 'banter' that often veils or excuses malign or toxic behaviour in police ranks.

Angiolini Inquiry, Angiolini Inquiry Part 1 Report · 29 Feb 2024 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry recommended that every police force publicly commit to being anti-sexist, anti-misogynistic, and anti-racist. In October 2026, the Cabinet Office reported that the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) committed to being anti-discriminatory in February 2025, and that the vast majority of forces had completed commitments to being anti-racist, anti-sexist, and anti-misogynistic or anti-discriminatory (Cabinet Office, Oct 2026). Earlier, in December 2025, the Angiolini Inquiry found that the national anti-discriminatory commitment had not been made or implemented by every police force in England and Wales (Rt Hon. Lady Elish Angiolini LT DBE PC KC, Dec 2025).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 16 Oct 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation asks for cultural or behavioural change, which is difficult to verify from published sources alone. The record above reflects policy commitments rather than measured outcomes.

Government response

●National Police Chiefs Council · Accepted · 25 Mar 2024

Words of: Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, Chair of the National Police Chiefs' Council, in an NPCC news release, 25 March 2024

We have reviewed the findings and recommendations in detail and accept them all. We have a number of ongoing national improvement plans and we are assessing how these will be updated and added to in light of the Inquiry findings.

Response document: Angiolini Inquiry is an urgent call to action

●Home Office · Under consideration · 29 Feb 2024

Words of: Home Office, Angiolini Inquiry Part 1, news story, 29 February 2024

However, the report today highlights the need for further action and the government, in tandem with policing partners, will thoroughly consider the recommendations made by Lady Elish and respond in full in due course.

Response document: Angiolini Inquiry Part 1

Delivery

●Cabinet Office says completed · 5 Oct 2026

The NPCC issued a press release, in February 2025, committing to being anti-discriminatory marking this national commitment. Vast majority of forces have completed this recommendation in line with commitments to being anti-racist, anti-sexist and anti-misogynistic or to bring anti-discriminatory.

From: Angiolini Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, October 2026 (data file)

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Angiolini Inquiry · 2 Dec 2025

1.43 Summary of progress: While a national commitment to being anti-discriminatory has been made (rather than anti-racist, anti-sexist and anti-misogynistic, as the recommendation stated), this commitment has not been made or implemented by each and every police force in England and Wales.

From: The Angiolini Inquiry Part 2 First Report: Prevention of sexually motivated crimes against women in public

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.