Strengthen recruitment and vetting practices
Angiolini Inquiry · Angiolini Inquiry Part 1 Report · Issued 29 February 2024 · Addressed to: College of Policing
Government responseHome Office: Accepted (Mar 2024)
DeliveryCabinet Office says in progress (Oct 2026)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation, Recommendation 8
By June 2024, the College of Policing, in collaboration with force vetting units, should take further steps to prevent those unsuitable for policing from joining the policing profession. This should include further developing the Vetting Code of Practice, Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting, and other guidance on recruitment and vetting practices in order to prevent those who commit sexually motivated crimes against women and those otherwise unsuitable for policing from holding the office of constable. In particular, recruitment and vetting policy, processes and practices must be developed in the following areas: a. Applicants should be required to undergo an assessment of their psychological suitability for the role (which is not just a questionnaire). b. There should be more robust use of the Police National Database during vetting, including as a tool to reveal unreported adverse information about applicants to ensure that potential risks are not missed. In particular, the Database should be used when individuals attempt to move between forces. c. Any individual identified as having a conviction or caution for a sexual offence should be rejected during police vetting. This should be clearly outlined in the Vetting Code of Practice and reflected in the Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting, which should consider all contact and non-contact sexual offences. d. The Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting should be amended to make it clear that military and/or Ministry of Defence checks should be carried out on all applicants who have served as military reservists. e. There should be a fundamental review of the link between debt, mental health, vulnerability to corruption and suitability to be a police officer, to inform vetting decisions. Detailed consideration should be given to the amount of unsecured personal debt held by officers, and rules should be amended to mandate officers to report any significant changes in debt to vetting teams. In addition, the rules should require applicants and officers to provide further insight into their finances, including any payday loans, when requested during the vetting process. f. There should be increased rigour in relation to checks for authorised firearms officers, to ensure that vetting standards are met, as well as the introduction of a psychological assessment and an appropriate process for seeking feedback from supervisors or line managers to determine suitability for the role. g. No police officer should be onboarded, even if only for initial training, before all vetting is complete. In addition, each officer's force vetting should be completed before their National Security Vetting is initiated. All force vetting information should be passed to National Security Vetting officers for consideration.
Angiolini Inquiry, Angiolini Inquiry Part 1 Report · 29 Feb 2024 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Inquiry asked the College of Policing to strengthen police recruitment and vetting practices. In October 2026, the Cabinet Office reported that guidance had been updated regarding sexual offences, military reservists, personal debt, and the Police National Database, while work remained ongoing on psychological assessments, armed officer vetting, and information sharing agreements with UK Security Vetting (Cabinet Office, Oct 2026). Earlier, in December 2025, the Angiolini Inquiry found that the recommendation's complexity had delayed progress, with four elements outstanding towards a completion date in 2026 (Rt Hon. Lady Elish Angiolini LT DBE PC KC, Dec 2025).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 16 Oct 2026.
Government response
●Home Office · Accepted · 25 Mar 2024
The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and College of Policing has at the same time committed to addressing the remaining recommendations in Lady Angiolini's report concerning police culture and increasing the robustness of police vetting.
Response document: Government accepts all recommendations made by Angiolini Inquiry
Earlier statement from Home Office (1)
●Home Office · Under consideration · 29 Feb 2024
However, the report today highlights the need for further action and the government, in tandem with policing partners, will thoroughly consider the recommendations made by Lady Elish and respond in full in due course.
Response document: Angiolini Inquiry Part 1
Delivery
●Cabinet Office says in progress · 5 Oct 2026
A working group has been established with representatives from NPCC, the College of Policing, wider stakeholders and subject matter experts to identify options and develop the required evidence base.
The revised Authorised Professional Practice strengthens the position that the Police National Database should be used proactively a part of standard vetting checks. Introduction of a Continuous Integrity Screening Tool, subject to funding, will provide a longer-term solution.
Adult applicants with any sexual offence conviction or caution are barred nationally. Authorised Professional Practice requires full disclosure of convictions and Appendix explicitly includes both contact and non-contact offences.
The Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting has been amended as per the recommendation.
The previous Authorised Professional Practice covered the financial aspect of this sub recommendation, marking it complete. The Authorised Professional Practice has been amended with specific reference to payday loans included. Further work is being undertaken to better understand the impact poor mental health can have on suitability to be a police officer.
The Authorised Professional Practice (APP) mandates management vetting (MV) for armed officers and MV requires a supervisors reference. Final part of the delivery of this sub recommendation is reliant on 8a as all the Vetting APP elements have been completed.
Most elements are complete, work continues with UK Security Vetting to finaliase the Information Sharing Agreement, Memorandum of Understanding and associated Cabinet Office policy changes.
From: Angiolini Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, October 2026 (data file)
What other bodies have found
●Angiolini Inquiry · 2 Dec 2025
1.31 Summary of progress: The ‘complexity’ of this recommendation has delayed progress. Three out of the seven sub-recommendations have been implemented through updating relevant guidance; four are outstanding, reliant either on evidence-gathering processes or the development of an overarching tool. The target date for completion of this recommendation is not until 2026.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.