JB-15.21 Under Consideration

Amend Criminal Procedure Rules for firearms court applications

Jermaine Baker Inquiry · Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · Issued 5 July 2022 · Addressed to: Ministry of Justice

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation, 15.21

There should be an amendment to the Criminal Procedure Rules which govern the process in applications for a firearms presence in court – a requirement for witness statements, sworn evidence and the taping of proceedings should all be included.

Jermaine Baker Inquiry, Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · 5 Jul 2022 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- This recommendation is directed to the Criminal Procedure Rule Committee regarding amendments governing firearms presence applications in court.
- No published evidence that the Criminal Procedure Rules have been amended to require witness statements, sworn evidence, and taping of proceedings for firearms presence applications has been identified to March 2026.
- The report was published on 5 July 2022; over three years have elapsed without published progress on this recommendation.
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)

Response — verbatim from government

Ministry of Justice

Directed to Criminal Procedure Rule Committee. Implementation status unclear.

Ministry of Justice · 1 Aug 2023 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 1 Aug 2023 Status as of College of Policing APP-AP update (August 2023): Not Started Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.