97

Clarify Compensation Act on apologies

IICSA · Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report · Issued 19 September 2019 · Addressed to: UK Government

Government responseMinistry of Justice: Noted (Apr 2020)

DeliveryMinistry of Justice says in progress (Apr 2020)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation, I

The government should introduce legislation revising the Compensation Act 2006 to clarify that section 2 facilitates apologies or offers of treatment or other redress to victims and survivors of child sexual abuse by institutions that may be vicariously liable for the actions or omissions of other persons, including the perpetrators.

IICSA, Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report · 19 Sep 2019 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In April 2020, HM Government stated that the Ministry of Justice would explore amending the Compensation Act 2006 or taking alternative action to clarify that its provisions facilitate apologies in vicarious liability cases (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020; Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020). It noted that the statute was not intended to apply solely to claims in negligence and breach of statutory duty, and promised to provide an update in due course (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020; Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020). The record holds no update since the government's response of April 2020 (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020; Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Government response

●Ministry of Justice · Noted · 6 Apr 2020

Words of: HM Government, The Government response to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse's Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report, published by the Ministry of Justice, 6 April 2020

The focus of the 2006 Act on claims in negligence and breach of statutory duty is not intended to suggest that the provision is only of relevance to those proceedings (and under the common law it may equally be relevant elsewhere, including in cases involving vicarious liability). In light of the Inquiry’s views, officials at the Ministry of Justice will explore further whether it would be helpful to amend the 2006 Act or take alternative action to clarify that this is the case, and we will update the Inquiry in due course.

Response document: The Government response to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse's Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report

Delivery

●Ministry of Justice says in progress · 6 Apr 2020

In light of the Inquiry’s views, officials at the Ministry of Justice will explore further whether it would be helpful to amend the 2006 Act or take alternative action to clarify that this is the case, and we will update the Inquiry in due course.

From: The Government response to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse's Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.