R11

Incident report on monitoring alarm failure

Allitt Inquiry · The Allitt Inquiry Report · Issued 11 February 1994 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Under consideration (Nov 1994)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England state no delivery position (Feb 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

We recommend that in the event of failure of an alarm on monitoring equipment, an untoward incident report should be completed and the equipment serviced before it is used again (para 5.11.6).

Allitt Inquiry, The Allitt Inquiry Report · 11 Feb 1994 Source PDF →

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Under consideration · 2 Nov 1994

Words of: Virginia Bottomley, Secretary of State for Health, in a written answer to Richard Spring MP, House of Commons, 2 November 1994

Recommendation 11. We recommend that in the event of a failure of an alarm on monitoring equipment, an untoward incident report should be completed and the equipment serviced before it is used again. This recommendation has been considered by the Expert Advisory Working Group appointed by the Medical Devices Agency who have responsibility for the safety and quality of medical devices. The draft recommendations of this Expert Group go further than those of recommendation 11. The Group is expected to present its final report later this month.

Extract from: Allitt Report, HC Deb 02 November 1994 vol 248 cc1232-4W

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England state no delivery position · 27 Feb 2026

The principal route for reporting regarding failure of a device to sound an alarm, would be to the MHRA Yellow Card system and the manufacturer. The MHRA yellow card system exists for reporting suspected medical device incidents and defective or falsified products to the MHRA.

Incident data should also be inputted into local risk management systems, such as Datix. As the new national NHS system for the recording and analysis of patient safety events, Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE), supports live data upload from such systems which will then be fed back to the MHRA to investigate. The current overarching framework for the reporting of patient safety incidents is the Patient safety Incident Response Framework (2023).

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Superseded”. Table row: section 3.2 No. 11, PDF page 19.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

In November 1994, the Secretary of State for Health said this recommendation had been considered by an expert advisory working group which had produced draft proposals which went further than this recommendation.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 3.2 No. 11, PDF page 19.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.