Rehabilitation code for CSA civil claims
IICSA · Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report · Issued 19 September 2019 · Addressed to: International Underwriting Association
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation, H
The International Underwriting Association of London should take the lead in the production of a code for the benefit of claimants who are bringing civil claims for child sexual abuse. The aim should be to produce a code, comparable to the Rehabilitation Code or for inclusion in that code, with the objective of ensuring that victims and survivors of child sexual abuse are able to access the therapy and support they need as soon as possible.
IICSA, Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report · 19 Sep 2019 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- In May 2023, the government noted that this recommendation was being progressed by the IUA (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published rehabilitation code for CSA claimants from the IUA has been identified to March 2026.
Response — verbatim from government
●UK Government
On 23 February 2021, the International Underwriting Association of London stated that it had established a working party to develop a rehabilitation code. On 14 December 2021, the International Underwriting Association of London stated that it had agreed to fund engagement with a group of victims and survivors for feedback on the rehabilitation code via a charitable donation to the Survivors' Trust. It hoped to finalise a draft rehabilitation code following these meetings. On 21 April 2022, the International Underwriting Association of London stated that work was carried out to source willing survivors to populate the group, which resulted in challenges that have affected the progression of this project.
UK Government · 22 May 2023 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.