IBI-A-7c Under Consideration

Unethical Research Award Amount Review

Infected Blood Inquiry · Additional Report on Compensation · Issued 9 July 2025 · Addressed to: UK Government

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The Minister consider whether the £10,000 (£15,000 for Treloar's pupils) should in justice be increased and further decides what sum he considers accords most closely with the general public's sense of justice and fairness in respect of an individual being subject of research without informed consent.

Infected Blood Inquiry, Additional Report on Compensation · 9 Jul 2025 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The available evidence indicates that this ministerial consideration-and-decision recommendation has been implemented in substance. The government reconsidered the amounts and announced higher award values, although the April 2026 source did not establish that payments at those rates had begun.
- The Government stated in July 2025 that it would consider whether the unethical research practices award amounts (£10,000 standard, £15,000 for Treloar's pupils) should be increased (Infected Blood Inquiry Additional Report: Government Response, Cabinet Office, July 2025).
- The government stated that Unethical Research awards would be £30,000 for adults, £45,000 for children and £60,000 for children treated at Treloar’s (Government Response to Consultation on Changes to the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme, Cabinet Office, 14 April 2026).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Codex (GPT-5), production evidence audit 2026-07-23 on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk

Response — verbatim from government

UK Government

The Government will consider whether the current unethical research practices award amounts (£10,000 standard, £15,000 for Treloar's pupils) should be increased.

UK Government · 21 Jul 2025 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 14 Apr 2026 · Cabinet Office The value of these awards has increased. Those who were treated as adults will receive an award of £30,000. Those who were treated as children will receive an award of £45,000. Children who were treated whilst attending Treloar’s will receive an award of £60,000. Source →
  • 21 Jul 2025 14 April 2026 update: Government response (CP 1565) increases Unethical Research award values: "Overall, we will increase the amount of compensation that all eligible people receive for unethical research. People who attended Treloar's will receive £60,000, rather than the £25,000 proposed in the consultation. Other children will receive £45,000. And those treated in adulthood will receive £30,000, rather than the £10,000 they receive currently." Regulations to implement these changes will be brought forward later in 2026. Sources: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/changes-to-infected-blood-compensation-scheme-will-improve-support-for-victims; https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69ddf5fd7e2086c62da2f152/Government_response_to_consultation_on_proposed_changes_to_the_infected_blood_compensation_scheme__PDF_.pdf Source →
  • 15 Jan 2026 · IBCA Community Update As of 13 January 2026: 3,721 people asked to start claims, 3,546 begun process, 3,074 received offers totalling £2.47bn, 2,861 paid totalling £1.89bn. Third compensation regulations in force 31 December 2025. View source → Good Progress

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.