Enhance fire protection by reviewing fuel tank standards and repositioning vulnerable tanks
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry · Ladbroke Grove Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 20 September 2001
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The following measures should be considered with a view to enhancing protection against fire: (i) a review of Group Standards in respect of improved crash resistance of fuel tanks; (ii) consideration of the feasibility of reducing fuel inventories and of utilising smaller fuel tanks; (iii) in respect of frontal impacts, consideration of the repositioning of fuel tanks away from the leading ends of trains from behind bogies wherever this is practicable; (iv) avoidance of placing fuel tanks in exposed and vulnerable locations; (v) examination of the use of additives to reduce the propensity of a fuel to atomise; (vi) the employment within fuel tanks of internal flexible linings or a honeycomb construction; (vii) consideration of the most appropriate material for fuel tanks; and (viii) recognition of the need for supporting theoretical and experimental work in respect of the foregoing (para 13.27).
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry, Ladbroke Grove Inquiry — Final Report · 20 Sep 2001 Source PDF →
Response — verbatim from government
●No formal government response recorded
The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.