Improve Railtrack procedures for implementing and monitoring accepted recommendations with clear accountability
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry · Ladbroke Grove Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 20 September 2001
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
Railtrack procedures, and the actions of management to enforce them, should be directed to ensuring that: (i) a recommendation which is accepted is implemented according to a defined timescale; (ii) the person to whom a recommendation is allocated for implementation is required to report periodically the action which has been taken, the state of progress and the reasons for any delay; (iii) the monitoring of the implementation of a recommendation is assigned to an identified individual whose duties are clearly defined, whether by job description, formal instruction, or training or a combination of these methods; (iv) the person to whom monitoring is assigned is required to ensure that the recommendation is implemented according to a defined timescale; (v) a recommendation should not be abandoned unless, exceptionally, this is shown to be fully justified to the person to whom monitoring is assigned; (vi) any management system to which the recommendation relates is altered to align it with the recommendation; (vii) the effectiveness of a recommendation is audited after its implementation; (viii) full records are kept of all recommendations and their state of progress; and (ix) there is a system for the central tracking of recommendations which are directed to Railtrack Line and those which, either immediately or thereafter, are directed to one or more of the Zones (para 7.106).
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry, Ladbroke Grove Inquiry — Final Report · 20 Sep 2001 Source PDF →
Response — verbatim from government
●No formal government response recorded
The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.