Local authority DI management and oversight review
Fuller Inquiry · Fuller Inquiry Phase 2 Report · Issued 15 July 2025 · Addressed to: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Dec 2025)
DeliveryDepartment of Health and Social Care says in progress (Jul 2026)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
There must be a review of the management and oversight arrangements for the mortuary service, taking into consideration who is appointed as the Designated Individual, their direct contact with the mortuary, level of influence within the local authority, and attendance at governance forums. In particular: Local authorities must ensure that the Designated Individual has enough time and resource to fulfil their statutory responsibilities, including time for learning and development. The Designated Individual must have access to director-level officers in the local authority. The Designated Individual must also be able to directly raise issues in relation to the mortuary at the highest level within the local authority if they deem it is necessary. Where the Designated Individual is non-technically trained, a senior anatomical pathology technologist must fulfil the Mortuary Manager role to ensure that there is sufficient technical experience within the mortuary. The Designated Individual must attend regular, documented meetings at mortuary level. The Designated Individual must also attend governance forums where the mortuary is discussed and scrutinised. In line with Human Tissue Authority guidance, the named Licence Holder must be at a more senior level than the Designated Individual (e.g. director level or higher) and have a clear understanding of the Human Tissue Authority's statutory requirements and the role of the Designated Individual.
Fuller Inquiry, Fuller Inquiry Phase 2 Report · 15 Jul 2025 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In July 2026, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health Innovation and Safety Preet Kaur Gill stated that government action includes "working with local authorities to support closer alignment with Human Tissue Authority standards on security, governance and audit" (Preet Kaur Gill, Jul 2026). Previously, in December 2025, the Department of Health and Social Care reported that the government had accepted the recommendation in principle, subject to further work to determine its full impact (Department of Health and Social Care response, Dec 2025).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Government response
●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 16 Dec 2025
The government has agreed to accept in principle 43 recommendations subject to further work to determine the full impact of these recommendations.
Extract from: Interim update on government progress in responding to the Fuller inquiry phase 2 report
Delivery
●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 15 Jul 2026
This includes working with local authorities to support closer alignment with Human Tissue Authority standards on security, governance and audit.
From: Government update on Progress in responding to the Fuller Inquiry Phase 2 report, Preet Kaur Gill, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health Innovation and Safety
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.