P2-24 Under Consideration

Anatomical education security and dignity policies

Fuller Inquiry · Fuller Inquiry Phase 2 Report · Issued 15 July 2025 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

All organisations providing anatomical education and training using donors should make sure that policies and procedures are in place to ensure the security and dignity of donors. These should include: security and access policies and the auditing of security and access measures such as swipe card access, CCTV and access to the locations where donors are kept; governance arrangements to ensure effective oversight of and accountability for the security and dignity of donors; a review of contracts or agreements with external organisations for the transfer of donors to or between facilities; and policies and processes on incident reporting, both within the organisation and to the Human Tissue Authority, that are clear and accessible to all students and staff.

Fuller Inquiry, Fuller Inquiry Phase 2 Report · 15 Jul 2025 Source PDF →

Response — verbatim from government

Department of Health and Social Care

This recommendation is under consideration.

Department of Health and Social Care · 1 Dec 2025

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 1 Dec 2025 Under consideration. The government will continue to work on its response to the recommendations and provide a full response to the Fuller inquiry phase 2 report by summer 2026. (Source: Interim update on government progress in responding to the Fuller inquiry phase 2 report, December 2025)

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.