IHRD-30 Accepted

Confidential Reporting of Clinical Concerns

Hyponatraemia Inquiry · Report of the Inquiry into Hyponatraemia-related Deaths · Issued 31 January 2018 · Addressed to: HSC Trusts

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

Confidential on-line opportunities for reporting clinical concerns should be developed, implemented and reviewed.

Hyponatraemia Inquiry, Report of the Inquiry into Hyponatraemia-related Deaths · 31 Jan 2018 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Department of Health NI reported that confidential reporting mechanisms had been established (IHRD Implementation Programme, Department of Health NI, March 2018).
- A major redesign of the Serious Adverse Incident process was undertaken, including the development of an SAI Engagement Platform.
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 17 Jul 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The evidence above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Response — verbatim from government

HSC Trusts

Confidential reporting mechanisms established.

HSC Trusts · 1 Mar 2018 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 6 Feb 2026 · Department of Health NI / HSC Trusts SAI reporting training provided and confidential reporting mechanisms established. A major redesign of the SAI process is in consultation (March-June 2025) but the new framework has not been formally adopted. View source → Reasonable Progress

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.