Accountability for quality accounts
Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Healthcare providers
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
Healthcare providers should be required to have their quality accounts independently audited. Auditors should be given a wider remit enabling them to use their professional judgement in examining the reliability of all statements in the accounts.
Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- NHS foundation trusts were previously required by Monitor to commission external assurance on aspects of their Quality Report in a prescribed format, providing a degree of independent audit. However, this requirement has been withdrawn; NHS foundation trusts no longer produce a separate Quality Report and there is no national requirement for external auditor assurance on Quality Accounts (NHS England, Quality Accounts Requirements).
- Quality Accounts remain a legal requirement under the NHS (Quality Accounts) Regulations 2010, but trusts may choose to locally commission assurance — this is voluntary, not mandatory.
- Integrated Care Boards have assumed responsibilities for review and scrutiny of Quality Accounts, providing a layer of external oversight, but this is not equivalent to the independent professional audit with a wider remit that Francis recommended.
- The Care Act 2014 (Sections 92-94) created a criminal offence for supplying false or misleading information (see F250), which provides a legal deterrent against inaccurate quality reporting. However, the wider auditor remit Francis envisaged — enabling professional judgement in examining the reliability of all statements in the accounts — has not been implemented as a mandatory requirement.
Response — verbatim from government
●Department of Health and Social Care
The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf
Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 1 Jan 2025 · NHS England - Quality Accounts NHS providers required to publish annual quality accounts under Health Act 2009 and NHS (Quality Accounts) Regulations 2010. Strengthened by Health and Social Care Act 2012. Published annually by 30 June. Includes mandatory quality indicators. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
- 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
- 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.