F215

Shared code of ethics

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

A common code of ethics, standards and conduct for senior board-level healthcare leaders and managers should be produced and steps taken to oblige all such staff to comply with the code and their employers to enforce it.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry recommended an enforceable code of ethics and conduct for senior healthcare leaders. In commentary of September 2024, published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England reported that a leadership competency framework for board members was published in February 2024, alongside ongoing co-development of a wider leadership framework and code of practice (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In September 2026, the Thirlwall Inquiry recorded that the NHS Leadership and Management Framework Code was published in July 2026 (The Rt Hon. Lady Justice Thirlwall DBE, Sep 2026). The inquiry chair concluded that an omission undermined the document's credibility and recommended an urgent review of the code (The Rt Hon. Lady Justice Thirlwall DBE, Sep 2026).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 5 Oct 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The record above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted.
The standards produced by the Professional Standards Authority (Standards for members of NHS boards and Clinical Commissioning Group governing bodies in England) provide the basis for standards for senior board-level leaders and managers. The combination of behavioural standards along with technical competence and business processes sends an important signal about the need for leaders who have the right values and behaviour as well as the ability to get the business done. The standards will form part of a wider system of ensuring that senior people are fit and proper persons that will be developed in detail in the coming months. In addition to the responsibility of individual leaders for compliance with technical and behavioural standards, the corporate structures of NHS organisations also need to both reinforce these standards and provide effective oversight of individual and corporate performance to determine whether they are being met, and what needs to be done to improve performance. The NHS Leadership Academy has published The Healthy NHS Board 2013, which includes guidance on supporting board effectiveness and emphasises the importance of values and behaviours.
We agree that the public have the right to expect that people in leading positions in NHS organisations are fit and proper persons; and that where it is demonstrated that a person is not fit and proper, they should not be able to occupy such a position. Monitor and the Care Quality Commission are committed to ensuring that, taken together, their processes for registration and licensing reflect these principles. The Care Quality Commission’s inspection regime will include a focus on whether or not an organisation is ‘well-led’.
In order to support this, the Government issued in July 2013 a consultation on Strengthening corporate accountability in health and social care. This proposes a new requirement that all Board Directors (or equivalents) of providers registered with the Care Quality Commission must meet a new fitness test. We are proposing that this test includes checks about whether the person is of good character including past employment history, and if the individual has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary for the work or office as well as the more traditional consideration of criminal and financial matters.

Extract from: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

The NHS Leadership Competency Framework for Board members, was published in February 2024 and has been designed around six competency domains to support the recently refreshed Fit and Proper Persons regime. This aligns to the already-established NHS Values as set throughout in the NHS Constitution, as well as our NHS People Promise, Our Leadership way, and the Seven Principles of Public Life. Compliance with the NHS Constitution is mandated via the NHS Standard Contract.

An independent evaluation of the NHS Leadership Competency Framework is planned for 2025.

Framework for all managers in all the NHS

As set out in Recommendation 1, NHS England is also leading work on the co-development of a management and leadership framework, which will include a Code of Practice for all leaders and managers, standards and competencies at all defined levels of manager and a core curriculum to ensure all leadership and management training contains the most impactful elements as defined in the standards.

This is being co-designed with key health and social care stakeholders, and engagement commenced over summer 2024, supported by a national steering group. Wider stakeholder engagement is planned over autumn/winter 2024/25.

See also response to recommendation 79 and 81 on the FPPT.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented - ongoing”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 215, PDF page 535.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

The Care Quality Commission is taking forward the development of a ‘fit and proper persons’ test for board-level leaders in the organisations registered with it, whether in the public, private or voluntary sectors. Fit and Proper Persons Test Regulations have been passed by Parliament and are in place in November 2014 for NHS organisations and from April 2015 for other organisations.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry · 15 Sep 2026

This omission rather undermines the document’s credibility. I recommend an urgent review of the code so that this may be remedied.

From: Report of the Thirlwall Inquiry: Countess of Chester Hospital, 2015 to 2018, Volume III (accessible)

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

The Professional Standards Authority published ‘Standards for members of NHS boards and Clinical Commissioning Group governing bodies in England’ in May 2013.

The NHS Leadership Academy published ‘The Healthy NHS Board 2013’, which included guidance on supporting board effectiveness and the importance of values and behaviours.

It is unclear the extent of steps taken to oblige staff to comply with the above guidance and standards and the steps by employers to enforce it.

In the February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government referred to the introduction of the fit and proper persons test.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 215, PDF page 496.

●Health and Social Care Committee Expert Panel · 22 Mar 2024

We conclude that there are some specific issues in terms of enforcement and lack of investment in training. We therefore conclude that progress towards meeting this recommendation requires improvement.

From: Expert Panel: Evaluation of the Government's progress on meeting patient safety recommendations (Second Special Report of Session 2023-24)

Earlier findings (3)

●Thirlwall Inquiry · 15 Sep 2026

As I have set out in Chapter 37, the NHS Leadership and Management Framework Code was published in July 2026.

From: Report of the Thirlwall Inquiry: Countess of Chester Hospital, 2015 to 2018, Volume III (accessible)

●Health and Social Care Committee Expert Panel · 22 Mar 2024

In their response to our evaluation, the PSA were clear in their view that the recommendation had not been met, stating: “It is our understanding that recommendation 215 has not been fully implemented, despite several attempts to address a standards and accountability gap relating to NHS managers.”

From: Expert Panel: Evaluation of the Government's progress on meeting patient safety recommendations (Second Special Report of Session 2023-24)

●Health and Social Care Committee Expert Panel · 22 Mar 2024

In summary, it seems to us that the Government has accepted the recommendation but not approached it in a way which stakeholders consider satisfactory.

From: Expert Panel: Evaluation of the Government's progress on meeting patient safety recommendations (Second Special Report of Session 2023-24)

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.