F186

Practical hands-on training and experience

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: NMC

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say partially delivered (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Nursing training should be reviewed so that sufficient practical elements are incorporated to ensure that a consistent standard is achieved by all trainees throughout the country. This requires national standards.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England reported in February 2026 that the recommendation was partially implemented and closed, stating that the Nursing and Midwifery Council viewed its standards requiring 50 percent practice learning as meeting the recommendation, though the council had committed to reviewing those requirements further (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). Previously, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team found in May 2024 that an earlier evaluation had judged the council's education standards broadly effective while identifying points for future revision (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The record above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted.
The Nursing and Midwifery Council has already taken steps to address this.
The Nursing and Midwifery Council published new standards for all pre-registration nursing programmes in 2010 which must be followed at all the universities they approve to run nursing courses. The previous 2004 standards were updated and strengthened as a result of the findings of the first Francis Inquiry and emerging evidence at that time. The first nurses to have followed programmes approved against the new standards will commence practice in 2014.
These national pre-registration nursing standards include the content and practice/study time ratios required by European Directive. All the nursing programmes last at least three years and require 50 per cent of time to be spent in practice learning and 50 per cent in academic study. The first progression point cannot be passed unless the student undertakes a period of practice learning and assessment. Currently formal learning and supervised work as a healthcare support worker can be counted through accredited prior learning routes.
The Nursing and Midwifery Council will be undertaking a full evaluation of these new education standards, commencing in 2014, and will have particular regard to these issues of caring and compassion. This will give a proper evidence base for any further revisions to these new standards, and the Nursing and Midwifery Council will consider this recommendation in parallel with their evaluation.
Although the overarching national standards are in place, the detail of the nursing curriculum is dynamic. Employers, service providers and universities are now brought together in Local Education and Training Boards, as part of the Health Education England system, to ensure all NHS funded courses are fit for purpose and reflect service needs. We expect this new part of the system to recognise the importance of Compassion in Practice, the vision and strategy for nursing in England and the values and behaviours it describes in the ‘6Cs’ to be part of the local review of courses and incorporated into the detailed undergraduate nursing curriculum.
Health Education England and the Nursing and Midwifery Council will continue to collaborate on ensuring the undergraduate nursing curriculum meets patient need.

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say partially delivered · 27 Feb 2026

While the NMC understood the basis for this recommendation, it was their position that these concerns had been addressed through the introduction of the UK-wide pre-registration education standards for nurse and midwives since. Under these changes, all education programmes last at least three years and require 50 percent of time to be spent in practice learning and 50 percent in academic study. The first progression point cannot be passed unless the student takes a period of practice learning and assessment. The NMC felt that this met the spirit of the recommendation.

Whilst its requirements for practice learning remain the same today, the NMC have kept these under regular review, ensuring they reflect best available evidence, and that people are safe and fit to practise at the point of entry.

In particular, in July 2014 the NMC commissioned IFF Research to evaluate its pre-registration standards. With regards to practice-based learning, this identified a broad consensus that the split between academic and practice-based elements of undergraduate programmes is appropriate so long as the quality of placements (and mentorship) is high and effectively facilitates the attainment of skills. Whilst some stakeholders wanted to see an increased emphasis on practice, pushing it up closer to 60-70%, it was acknowledged that this is unlikely to be feasible in a context of limited placement opportunities as well as limited mentor numbers. A further review of the NMC’s education and training standards was undertaken in September 2021.

Considering the number of academic theory and practice hours, the review found that there is no agreement on the type, quality or quantity of hours necessary. In 2022 the NMC also undertook specific research to understand more about practice hours in other countries and whether alignment with EU law is appropriate. This found that the number of practice hours were often lower in other countries when compared to the UK, but that this was a result of political or pragmatic reasons as opposed to evidence on the number of hours required for safe and effective practice. All sets of research provided us with assurance as to the level of practice hours set.

The NMC’s education standards were updated in 2023 following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. The amount of practice learning hours remains the same - all education programmes must meet the equivalent minimum length of three (academic) years for full time programmes which consist of a minimum of 4,600 hours. 50 percent of time (2,300 hours) must be spent in practice learning, of which a maximum of 600 hours can be simulated practice learning. The number of practice learning hours are in line with those mandated by EU law.

The NMC first introduced emergency standards during covid to allow education institutions to deliver a proportion of practice learning through simulation. Following extensive review, the NMC has made this a permanent standard in recognition that simulated practice learning methods are becoming increasingly sophisticated and help students build their confidence and skills in a range of situations they may not otherwise encounter frequently in practice. Following changes made to its education programme standards in 2023, the NMC has committed to reviewing its nursing and midwifery practice learning to ensure requirements support students to deliver the best possible person-centred care for people across a range of practice learning environments. This will also consider how changes to simulated practice learning are being delivered.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Partially implemented - Closed”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 186, PDF page 517-519.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

The Nursing and Midwifery Council has commenced the evaluation of their standards for pre-registration education for nurses and midwives. Central to the evaluation are questions about the effectiveness of standards in preparing nurses and midwives for their professional roles and responsibilities which include care, compassion and leadership. The Nursing and Midwifery Council is in the final stages of appointing an independent evaluation supplier will proactively share any interim findings with Health Education England to tie into the Shape of Caring Review. The Nursing and Midwifery Council’s final report should be available in September 2015. The outcomes of the evaluation will provide an evidence base for future reviews of their pre registration standards for education so that they can, where necessary, enhance the UK standards for nurse and midwifery competence and education.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to the Nursing and Midwifery Council, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government said that the Nursing and Midwifery Council had introduced new education standards (see above). The Nursing and Midwifery Council also undertook a review of the new education standards in 2014-15. The review concluded that the standards were broadly effective, but that there were points of consideration for future development or revision of standards, including revision of use of language to reduce ambiguity; improvement in the structure of standards; further promotion of awareness of their content among key audiences; some outcomes to be added to the standards; and further entry criteria.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 186, PDF page 482.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.