F175 Accepted

Candour about harm

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Healthcare providers

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

Full and truthful answers must be given to any question reasonably asked about his or her past or intended treatment by a patient (or, if deceased, to any lawfully entitled personal representative).

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England stated in April 2025 that the joint duty of candour guidance by the Nursing and Midwifery Council and General Medical Council was updated in March 2022 (DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
- The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England stated in April 2025 that the General Medical Council publishes guidance on shared decision making and consent (DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
- A review of the statutory duty of candour in November 2024 found that 52% of respondents believed the Care Quality Commission had not adequately enforced the duty (DHSC - Duty of Candour Review, November 2024).

Sources

DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry (April 2025)
Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis (February 2023)
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Gemini (Google) on 30 Jun 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The evidence above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Response — verbatim from government

Department of Health and Social Care

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 1 Apr 2025 DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry (April 2025). This is the government's own account of progress, submitted to the inquiry. Reviewed extent of implementation: Implemented - Ongoing. A joint statement of the statutory regulators has confirmed that every health and care professional must be open and honest with patients and people in their care when something that goes wrong with their treatment or care causes, or has the potential to cause, harm or distress. The joint duty of candour guidance by NMC and GMC was updated in March 2022 The General Medical Council (GMC) also publish guidance on shared decision making and consent. This includes information that doctors should give to patients when discussing their options. Please see response to Recommendation 21 and 174 above regarding the statutory duty of candour. Source →
  • 26 Nov 2024 · DHSC - Duty of Candour Review DHSC published findings of call for evidence on statutory duty of candour. 261 responses received. Key finding: 52% of respondents said CQC had not adequately enforced the duty. Many reported it had become a "tick-box exercise". Only 40% thought the purpose was clear and well understood. Final government response still pending. View source → Reasonable Progress
  • 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
  • 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
  • 27 Nov 2014 · Legislation - Duty of Candour (Regulation 20) Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, Regulation 20: statutory duty of candour came into force for NHS trusts November 2014, extended to all CQC-registered providers April 2015. Requires providers to notify patients/families of notifiable safety incidents and apologise. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.