F167 Accepted in Part

Approved Practice Settings

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: GMC

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The Department of Health and the General Medical Council should review the powers available to the General Medical Council in support of assessment and monitoring of approved practice settings establishments with a view to ensuring that the General Medical Council (or if considered to be more appropriate, the healthcare systems regulator) has the power to inspect establishments, either itself or by an appointed entity on its behalf, and to require the production of relevant information.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- DHSC and NHS England stated in April 2025 that the GMC embedded Approved Practice Setting arrangements within the Responsible Officer Regulations in June 2014, requiring doctors to have a prescribed connection to a designated body (DHSC/NHS England implementation update to Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
- The Health and Care Act 2022 formalised the merger of NHS Improvement and NHS England (Health and Care Act 2022, July 2022).
- The Penny Dash Review in October 2024 reported significant operational failings at the Care Quality Commission, including a lack of specialist expertise and low inspection levels (Review into the operational effectiveness of the Care Quality Commission, DHSC, October 2024).
- No further published evidence specific to the GMC's powers to inspect Approved Practice Settings has been identified since 2014.
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Gemini (Google) on 30 Jun 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk

Response — verbatim from government

Department of Health and Social Care

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 1 Apr 2025 DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry (April 2025). This is the government's own account of progress, submitted to the inquiry. Reviewed extent of implementation: Partially implemented - Closed. Following the recommendations made about approved practice settings in the Report, the GMC committed to undertaking a fundamental review of the scheme in 2013. The review concluded that the GMC should embed the approved practice settings arrangements within the wider statutory framework of the Responsible Officer Regulations. In effect, this prevents doctors who are newly registered or recently restored to the register from practising if they do not have a prescribed connection to a designated body and Responsible Officer (RO) under the regulations. A prescribed connection ensures that a doctor is working for an organisation that has established clinical governance and oversight including monitoring clinical effectiveness and quality assurance of its services. All doctors in postgraduate training are placed in providers that are designated bodies and themselves have a prescribed connection to an RO within the relevant Deanery. The new arrangements were introduced in June 2014. Source →
  • 15 Oct 2024 · DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025. View source → limited_progress
  • 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
  • 1 Apr 2016 · Legislation - Health and Social Care Act 2012 (Monitor reformed) Monitor merged with the Trust Development Authority to form NHS Improvement from 1 April 2016. NHS Improvement then merged with NHS England from 1 July 2022 under Health and Care Act 2022. Francis recommended incremental merger of system regulatory functions between Monitor and CQC; this was partially achieved through structural reorganisation. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
  • 7 Nov 2014 · Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20). View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 1 Oct 2014 · CQC - New Inspection Regime CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress
  • 3 Dec 2012 · GMC - Medical Revalidation GMC medical revalidation launched December 2012. All licensed doctors must demonstrate fitness to practise every five years through appraisal and evidence. Francis Report endorsed and recommended strengthening revalidation. View source → Confirmed Completed

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.