F152

Medical training

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Healthcare providers

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Any organisation which in the course of a review, inspection or other performance of its duties, identifies concerns potentially relevant to the acceptability of training provided by a healthcare provider, must be required to inform the relevant training regulator of those concerns.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In commentary submitted in September 2024 and published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England stated that implementation was ongoing, noting that Health Education England merged with NHS England in 2023 and that an Education Quality Framework was refreshed in 2024 (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team noted that information-sharing protocols had been agreed between the Care Quality Commission, the General Medical Council, and the Nursing and Midwifery Council to share concerns about training (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The record above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted.
In the new health and care system architecture, Memoranda of Understanding exist between key partners such as Health Education England and the Care Quality Commission, to share information and concerns about the quality and safety of providers. Memoranda of Understanding and other protocols for sharing information also exist between the Care Quality Commission and the General Medical Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council. Health Education England will work with the system and professional regulators to develop these further.
The recently established Quality Surveillance Groups bring together the different parts of the system to share information including shared views of risks to quality and any early warning signs of risk about poor quality. Health Education England as well as the system and professional regulators are members of the regional Quality Surveillance Groups.

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

Health Education England merged with NHS England in 2023.

The Education Quality Framework (last refreshed 2024) applies to the quality of all healthcare education and training of all learners across all clinical learning environment within which they are placed, and provides an over-arching set of multi-professional quality standards for the clinical learning environment.

The NHS England education quality function works with education and placement providers, and other stakeholders, to support learners in their career pathways and transition from healthcare education programmes to employment. We work collaboratively with system partners to maintain and improve practice placement capacity and capability. By working in partnership, we can ensure training is responsive to new care delivery models and supports workforce transformation and a sustainable workforce supply.

The actions set out in the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan support our commitment to improving the quality of healthcare education and training and reduce course leaving rates.

The National School of Healthcare Science is responsible for accrediting work-based providers of school programmes.

Royal Colleges set professional standards.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented - ongoing”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 152, PDF page 496.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

The national guidance for the operation of Quality Surveillance Groups was updated in March 2014 to reflect early experience of sharing information between system regulators and commissioners. Early discussions about information causing concern are now occurring before meetings between local representatives of NHS England, the Care Quality Commission, Monitor and Health Education England, with some shared quality monitoring visits occurring where this is relevant.

Quality Surveillance Groups are beginning to review health care economies rather than just acute care providers and plan themed meetings, considering specific risk areas across providers, for example the provision of intermediate care or older person’s services. Quality monitoring visits are also evolving - Health Education England is developing a multi-professional approach to visiting, encompassing the education and training culture and environment for all healthcare professionals. As Health Education England and the Care Quality Commission refine their acute, community and primary care visiting processes, updated memoranda of understanding will be required and there will be increasing opportunities to incorporate experience of quality monitoring processes in to clinician’s training. Health Education England is finalising the memoranda of understanding with the Care Quality Commission. Health Education England is also currently working with the professional regulators to develop a series of memoranda of understanding, where appropriate, to support the ongoing working relationships with the aim of promoting patient safety and high quality education and training.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to healthcare providers, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government as well as by the General Medical Council in its spring 2013 initial response.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government said that memoranda of understanding and protocols for sharing information existed between the Care Quality Commission and Health Education England, the General Medical Council and the Nursing a Midwifery Councill. The Government also referred to Health Education England’s membership of regional Quality Surveillance Groups.

A Memorandum of Understanding between Health Education England and the Care Quality Commission memorandum of understanding (publicly available version dated May 2016) included information sharing provisions between the two organisations.

The joint operational protocol between General Medical Council and the Care Quality Commission (publicly available version dated June 2020) contained information sharing provisions, including any concerns the General Medical Council has about training.

The joint working protocol between the Nursing and Midwifery Council and the Care Quality Commission (publicly available version dated November 2017) contained information sharing provisions, including any concerns the Nursing and Midwifery Council had about training at an organisation.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 152, PDF page 463-464.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.