Inspection powers
Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
Scrutiny committees should have powers to inspect providers, rather than relying on local patient involvement structures to carry out this role, or should actively work with those structures to trigger and follow up inspections where appropriate, rather than receiving reports without comment or suggestions for action.
Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- The Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee principles (2022) state that committees can request evidence from NHS bodies but do not provide for independent inspection powers (Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee Principles, DHSC, July 2022).
- The government stated in November 2013 that it accepted the recommendation in principle and would consider how to strengthen the role of scrutiny (Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First, DHSC, November 2013).
Sources
How was this evidence gathered?
Response — verbatim from government
●Department of Health and Social Care
The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf
Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 1 Apr 2025 DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry (April 2025). This is the government's own account of progress, submitted to the inquiry. Reviewed extent of implementation: Not yet actioned. Please see response to Recommendation 147 The Health overview and scrutiny committee (HOSC) principles published in July 2022 sets out the expectations of working together. HOSCs can request evidence from systems and NHS bodies, and should ensure that their requests for evidence are reasonable, proportionate and relevant. The health system has a responsibility to provide information needed for health scrutiny. Health and care providers and commissioners should respond positively and constructively to the requests for information from HOSCs. Where an NHS body cannot provide a response to a request for information, it should work with the HOSC to attempt to provide information and support where possible. ICBs should have plans and protocols in place for sharing information for the purpose of scrutiny, as this will avoid the need for continual ad-hoc decision-making when information is requested. Source →
- 1 Jun 2025 · National Guardian's Office - Annual Data 2024-25 Over 1,400 Freedom to Speak Up Guardians across healthcare organisations in England. 38,000+ cases raised in 2024-25, cumulative total exceeds 142,000 since inception. However, NHS Staff Survey 2024 shows only 71.5% of staff feel secure raising concerns about unsafe practice (stagnant for years), and only 57% are confident their organisation would address concerns. View source → Reasonable Progress
- 1 Apr 2025 · NHS England - Martha's Rule Martha's Rule ensures patients, families and staff can access rapid review from critical care outreach team when concerned about deterioration. Phase 1 launched May 2024 at 143 pilot sites. Phase 2 expanded to all acute trusts April 2025. Early data: 9,135 calls Sep 2024-Nov 2025; 286 led to urgent critical care review. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 15 Oct 2024 · DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025. View source → limited_progress
- 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
- 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Freedom to Speak Up Review Sir Robert Francis published Freedom to Speak Up Review on 11 February 2015 with 20 principles and actions. Led to: Freedom to Speak Up Guardians mandatory in all NHS trusts from October 2016; National Guardian's Office established January 2016. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
- 7 Nov 2014 · Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20). View source → Confirmed Completed
- 1 Oct 2014 · CQC - New Inspection Regime CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.