F135

Public accountability of commissioners and public engagement

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Commissioners

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Commissioners should be accountable to their public for the scope and quality of services they commission. Acting on behalf of the public requires their full involvement and engagement: There should be a membership system whereby eligible members of the public can be involved in and contribute to the work of the commissioners. There should be lay members of the commissioner's board. Commissioners should create and consult with patient forums and local representative groups. Individual members of the public (whether or not members) must have access to a consultative process so their views can be taken into account. There should be regular surveys of patients and the public more generally. Decision-making processes should be transparent: decision-making bodies should hold public meetings. Commissioners need to create and maintain a recognisable identity which becomes a familiar point of reference for the community.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England stated in September 2024 that the Health and Care Act 2022 replaced clinical commissioning groups with integrated care boards, which must follow statutory guidance on community partnership and undergo annual assessments of their public involvement duties (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team noted that the government had originally accepted the recommendation in part, reviewing earlier measures such as lay governing body members, citizen assemblies, and regular patient surveys (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted in part.
Provisions for a new commissioning system in the Health and Social Care Act 2012 address most of the elements of this recommendation. For example, provisions cover the new role of lay members on Clinical Commissioning Group governing bodies, the duty on public involvement and consultation on both NHS England and clinical commissioning groups, and the key role of local Healthwatch in giving people a powerful voice locally in improving and shaping health services.
A range of mechanisms is now available for involving the public in commissioning decisions without requiring the development of new ‘membership’ models. In September 2013 NHS England issued Transforming Participation In Health And Care, statutory guidance for clinical commissioning groups on involving patients in planning services and in their own care. By December 2013, 80% of clinical commissioning groups will be commissioning support for patients’ participation and decisions in relation to their own care or will have a plan to do so. This will include information and support for self-management, personalised care planning and shared decision-making.
There are a number of regular national and local patient and public surveys. These include the annual national GP patient survey, run for NHS England by Ipsos MORI, and a national programme of patient surveys run for the Care Quality Commission by Picker Institute Europe. In addition, since April 2013 all providers of NHS funded care have been required to offer inpatients and users of accident and emergency services the opportunity to provide feedback through the NHS friends and family test. The first set of data for the Accident and Emergency friends and family test, covering April, May and June was published on 30 July 2013. A second set of thisdata was published on 30 August and a third on 3 October. 793,448 responses have been received to date. The current response rate is 17.1%.
The friends and family test allows hospital trusts to gain real time feedback on their services down to individual ward level, and increases the transparency of NHS data to drive up choice and quality. The real strength of friends and family test lies in the follow-up questions that can be attached to the initial question, and a rich source of patient views can be used locally to highlight and address concerns much more rapidly than with more traditional survey methods.
It is our intention that by March 2015, all NHS service users will be given the opportunity to provide feedback through the friends and family test. Maternity services started using the Test from 1 October 2013, with the first set of results to be published after the first quarter, at the end of January 2014. Work is currently underway to develop guidance for the introduction of the test to all other NHS settings. Guidance for staff to support the introduction of the friends and family test from April 2014 is on course to be published by the end of December 2013.
NHS England is developing plans to establish in 2014 a Citizens Assembly – pioneering a new approach to ensuring citizen voice is able to hold it to account. NHS England has also established a ‘Voices in Governance’ model in Specialised Commissioning, to ensure that the patient and public voice is at the heart of commissioning processes.
NHS England and clinical commissioning groups are developing, through the NHS Commissioning Assembly, a Framework for Commissioning for Quality which will be published in Autumn 2013. It will set out the steps that commissioners should take to assure themselves and their patients that the services that they are commissioning are safe, clinically effective and result in a positive experience for patients.
Clinical Commissioning Groups are required to take a number of steps to ensure transparency in their decision making processes. The constitution of the Clinical Commissioning Group must specify the arrangements made for securing that there is transparency about the decisions of the group and the manner in which they are made. The governing body must also publish papers considered at its meetings (except where it would not be in the public interest to do so).

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

Health and wellbeing boards (HWBs) have been a key mechanism for driving joined up working at a local level since they were established in 2013 and provide a forum where political, clinical, professional and community leaders from across the care and health system come together to improve the health and wellbeing of their local population, and look to reduce health inequalities. In developing Joint Strategic Needs Assessments, HWBs should look to involve the local community and representative organisations.

The Health and Care Act 2022 introduced new architecture to the health and care system, specifically the establishment of integrated care boards (ICBs) and integrated care partnerships (ICPs). These replaced Clinical Commissioning Groups. HWBs play a vital role in integrated care systems, as part of the closer working arrangements between health and local authority partners.

Statutory guidance exists for Integrated Care Boards on how they should work in partnership with people and communities including supporting them to meet their public involvement legal duties. This work needs to be described in the Integrated Care Board (ICB) annual report.

NHS England is required to carry out an annual assessment setting out how well the ICB has performed on its statutory duties, including how the ICB has promoted patient and public involvement and choice. Assessments can be viewed via individual ICB websites.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – ongoing (named infrastructure is partly superseded)”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 135, PDF page 488-489.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

By December 2013, 80% of clinical commissioning groups were commissioning support for patients’ participation and decisions in relation to their own care or had a plan to do so. A Citizens Assembly was launched in March 2014, with the first Excellence in Participation Awards held alongside this to celebrate excellence and innovation in patient and public participation. A task and finish group has been established to help develop guidance for commissioners and providers on the definition, principles and processes of personalised care planning; this guidance was published in January 2015. A number of commissioning support units have been appointed to provide support to clinical commissioning groups in engaging with patients and the public. Ongoing support is also being provided to NHS England commissioners in specialised commissioning to ensure the participation of patients and the public. The Friends and Family test became available in GP practices on 01 December 2014 and then expanded to mental health services and community services on 01 January 2015. Other services will offer the friends and family test from April 2015 such as NHS dental practices, ambulance services, patient transport services, acute hospitals outpatients and day cases. The aim is for the Friends and Family test to cover all NHS services by the end of 2015. Guidance for staff on the Friends and Family test was published in February 2014.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to commissioners, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted in part by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government referred to the implementation of a new role for lay members on clinical commissioning group governing bodies. The Government said, however, that there were a range of mechanisms for involving the public in commissioning decisions without requiring the development of new ‘membership’ models. The Government also referred to a duty of public involvement on clinical commissioning group. The Government said NHS England published guidance on clinical commissioning groups and public participation in September 2013. The Government further referred to there being regular national and local patient and public surveys as well as the NHS friends and family tests. As to transparency, the Government said that the constitutions of clinical commissioning groups were required to specify the arrangements made for securing that there was transparency about the decisions of the group and the manner in which they were made.

In the February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government said that a Citizens Assembly had been launched in March 2014.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 135, PDF page 455-456.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.